Recent-onset atrial fibrillation: challenges and opportunities
European Heart Journal

Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly diagnosed early, close to its first occurrence due to: (i) increased public awareness with self-screening; (ii) health care initiatives including population screening and opportunistic case finding; and (iii) increased use and surveillance of implantable cardiac devices. At its onset, AF is often low burden, and cardiovascular co-morbidities may be absent or at an early stage. Thus, the management of recent-onset AF has become an issue of growing importance. Professional guidelines have traditionally focused on anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, generally recommending a cautious approach to rhythm control, and priority has been given to rate control to alleviate symptoms. In recent guidelines, the importance of managing lifestyle and co-morbidities has increased. The AF-SCREEN collaboration proposes that a vigorous approach to active management of recent-onset AF may be warranted. This includes addressing co-morbidities and promoting healthy lifestyles to prevent the emergence or progression of AF and associated cardiovascular disease, as well as the initiation of active rhythm control ± anticoagulation to prevent AF-related morbidity and mortality, including stroke and heart failure (HF). Intuitively, intervention early after AF onset would be beneficial since lifestyle and co-morbidity management, plus rhythm control and anticoagulation, are important contributors to improved outcomes in patients with established AF, but robust evidence is lacking for recent-onset AF. There is a delicate balance between achieving favourable outcomes such as preventing strokes, HF and AF progression vs the complications and potential adverse effects of interventions. Given the serious long-term consequences, innovative approaches are necessary to determine the value and risks of initiating active therapy very early in the course of AF. More data are needed to guide the best management of recent-onset AF, bearing AF burden in mind. Long-term studies using large national databases linked to electronic medical records and rhythm monitoring devices offer excellent opportunities. Shorter-term studies focusing on reducing AF burden to slow AF progression and studies focusing on outcomes such as HF could be used in both randomized clinical trials and observational cohort studies.
Contributors

Emma Svennberg
Author

Yitschak Biton
Author

Claire M Buckley
Author

Alan Cameron
Author

J L Clua-Espuny
Author

Harry J G M Crijns
Author
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht , Netherlands (The)

Wolfram Doehner
Author

Helena Dominguez
Author

Moti Haim
Author

Jeff S Healey
Author

Gerhard Hindricks
Author

F D Richard Hobbs
Author

Hooman Kamel
Author

Deirdre A Lane
Author
University of Liverpool Liverpool , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Lars-Åke Levin
Author

Gregory Y H Lip
Author
University of Liverpool Liverpool , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Shaowen Liu
Author

Trudie Lobban
Author

Peter W Macfarlane
Author
University of Glasgow Glasgow , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Georges H Mairesse
Author

Rod Passman
Author

Daniel D Reidpath
Author

Lena Rivard
Author

Prashanthan Sanders
Author

Roopinder K Sandhu
Author

Konstantinos C Siontis
Author

Steven R Steinhubl
Author

Andrew W Teh
Author

Sakis Themistoclakis
Author

Robert G Tieleman
Author

A John Camm
Author
City St George's University of London London , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
You may be interested in


























