ESC 365 - Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes: chairperson conclusion.

EACVI Premium Access

Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes: chairperson conclusion.

Session: Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases

Topic: Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR)

Event: EuroCMR 2019

Congress Presentation

Add to my library

9 more presentations in this session

Positioning of the topic: CMR ischaemia.

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: PRO

Speaker: Doctor P. Kellman (Bethesda, US)

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: CON

Speaker: Professor M. Dweck (Edinburgh, GB)

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: Rebuttals

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: chairperson conclusion.

Access the full session

Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases

Speakers: Doctor P. Kellman, Professor M. Dweck

About the event

EuroCMR 2019

2 May - 4 May 2019

Sessions Presentations

Congress

ESC 365 is supported by

Explore sponsored resources

Explore sponsored resources