ESC 365 - CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: PRO

Open Access

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: PRO

Session: Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases

Topic: Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR)

Speaker: Doctor P. Kellman (Bethesda, US)

Event: EuroCMR 2019

Congress Session

About the speaker

Doctor Peter Kellman

Bethesda (United States of America)

6 presentations

0 follower

9 more presentations in this session

Positioning of the topic: CMR ischaemia.

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: CON

Speaker: Professor M. Dweck (Edinburgh, GB)

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: Rebuttals

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: chairperson conclusion.

Positioning of the topic: anatomy of coronary stenosis.

Access the full session

Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases

Speakers: Doctor P. Kellman, Professor M. Dweck

About the event

EuroCMR 2019

2 May - 4 May 2019

Sessions Presentations

Congress

Related content

Open Access

When echocardiography is not enough: multimodality imaging to the rescue – discussion.

29 August 2021

Open Access

Multimodality imaging to quantify low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.

29 August 2021

Open Access

Multimodality imaging to determine the source of cardiac embolism.

29 August 2021

This platform is supported by