EACVI Premium Access

Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases

Event: EuroCMR 2019
Topic: Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR)
Session type: Debate Session
Date: 3 May 2019
Time: 09:35 - 10:50

Congress Session

10 presentations in this session

Positioning of the topic: CMR ischaemia.

Thumbnail

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: PRO

Speaker: Doctor P. Kellman (Bethesda, US)
Thumbnail

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: CON

Speaker: Professor M. Dweck (Edinburgh, GB)
Thumbnail

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: Rebuttals

Thumbnail

CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: chairperson conclusion.

Thumbnail

Positioning of the topic: anatomy of coronary stenosis.

Thumbnail

Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes:PRO

Speaker: Doctor G. Pontone (Milan, IT)
Thumbnail

Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes: CON.

Speaker: Doctor A. Arai (Bethesda, US)
Thumbnail

Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes: Rebuttals

Thumbnail

Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes: chairperson conclusion.

Thumbnail

4 speakers from this session

Doctor Peter Kellman

, Bethesda (United States of America)
6 presentations
0 follower

Professor Marc Dweck

University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh (United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland)
31 presentations
4 followers

Doctor Gianluca Pontone

University of Milan, Foundation Monzino (IRCCS), Center Cardiology, Dpt of Cardiology, Milan (Italy)
30 presentations
0 follower

Doctor Andrew Arai

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (United States of America)
5 presentations
0 follower

This platform is supported by

logo Novo Nordisk