Back

Anatomy of coronary stenosis is better than function to predict outcomes: Rebuttals

3 May 2019 (10:42 - 10:47)
Organised by:
Congress Presentation Part of: Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) EACVI Premium Access EuroCMR 2019

9 More presentations in this session

Presentation thumbnail
Positioning of the topic: CMR ischaemia.
Presentation thumbnail
CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: PRO
Doctor P. Kellman (Bethesda, US)
Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: CON
Professor M. Dweck (Edinburgh, GB)
Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: Rebuttals
Presentation thumbnail
CMR ischaemia tests: quantification is better than visual assessment: chairperson conclusion.

Access the full session

Session thumbnail
Pros/cons in ischaemic heart diseases

The Event

Event poster

EuroCMR 2019

3 May 2019 10:42 CET
You may be interested in
thumbnail
Webinar
Nuclear CT in CAD : Prognosis
10 May 2016
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with reduced cardiac performance in low flow low gradient aortic stenosis
27 August 2022
thumbnail
Congress Session
Evolution of coronary artery disease diagnosis ... from stenosis to inflammation
30 August 2024
thumbnail
Congress Session
Photon-counting CT in clinical practice: learn how much further you can go
11 May 2023

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources
novo-nordisk Explore sponsored resources

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources
novo-nordisk Explore sponsored resources