Pathophysiology, prevention, and management of coronary microvascular obstruction A clinical consensus statement of the ESC Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation, the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC

European Heart Journal

26 May 2026
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES, ACUTE CARDIAC CARE Acute Coronary Syndromes Interventional Cardiology

Abstract

Abstract

Although prompt primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the burden of post-infarction heart failure remains considerable and is expected to increase. A major contributory factor is suboptimal myocardial reperfusion, which persists in up to 60% of cases even with timely revascularization. This is largely driven by microvascular obstruction and ischaemia–reperfusion injury, culminating in the no-reflow phenomenon, a critical prognostic factor associated with impaired infarct healing, adverse left ventricular remodelling, and increased risk of heart failure and death. No-reflow is a complex and heterogeneous phenomenon, identifiable through different invasive and noninvasive technologies. When observed post-PCI, after excluding residual epicardial stenosis, it indicates poor microvascular perfusion and necessitates urgent management. Identifying patients at high risk and implementing early targeted interventions are essential to improving outcomes. Pharmacological therapies, including intracoronary adenosine and nitroprusside, have shown unclear benefit in improving microvascular flow. Non-pharmacological strategies, such as ischaemic postconditioning, intracoronary supersaturated oxygen therapy, stent-retriever thrombectomy, and mechanical left ventricular unloading, have demonstrated promise but require further validation in large-scale clinical trials. This clinical consensus statement summarizes current strategies for the prevention and treatment of no-reflow and underscores the need for improved risk stratification and novel microvasculature-targeted therapies. Addressing this persistent and significant unmet clinical need is crucial for improving care for STEMI patients and for mitigating its long-term complications, including heart failure and mortality.

Contributors

Edina Cenko
Edina Cenko

Author

University of Bologna Bologna , Italy

Giuseppe Vadalà
Giuseppe Vadalà

Author

Policlinico P. Giaccone Palermo , Italy

Daphne Merkus
Daphne Merkus

Author

Clinic of the University of Munich Grosshadern Munich , Germany

Marija Vavlukis
Marija Vavlukis

Author

University Clinic of Cardiology Skopje , North Macedonia

Gemma Vilahur
Gemma Vilahur

Author

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona , Spain

Ana Djordjevic-Dikic
Ana Djordjevic-Dikic

Author

University Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade , Serbia

Ines Drenjancevic
Ines Drenjancevic

Author

University J.J. Strossmayer Osijek , Croatia

Dirk J Duncker
Dirk J Duncker

Author

Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam , Netherlands (The)

Javier Escaned
Javier Escaned

Author

San Carlos Clinical Hospital Madrid , Spain

José Luis Ferreiro
José Luis Ferreiro

Author

University Hospital of Taragona Joan XXIII Tarragona , Spain

Raffaele Bugiardini
Raffaele Bugiardini

Author

University of Bologna Bologna , Italy

Ingrid Fleming
Ingrid Fleming

Author

Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt , Germany

Tomasz Guzik
Tomasz Guzik

Author

University of Edinburgh Edinburgh , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Olivia Manfrini
Olivia Manfrini

Author

Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna Bologna , Italy

Teresa Padro
Teresa Padro

Author

Research Institute - Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona , Spain

Italo Porto
Italo Porto

Author

IRCCS Policlinic San Martino Genoa , Italy