Standardized assessment of evidence supporting the adoption of mobile health solutions: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the ESC Young Community, the ESC Working Group on e-Cardiology, the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice, the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology, the ESC Council on Hypertension, the ESC Patient Forum, the ESC Digital Health Committee, and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC)

European Heart Journal - Digital Health

4 June 2024
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals

Abstract

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) solutions have the potential to improve self-management and clinical care. For successful integration into routine clinical practice, healthcare professionals (HCPs) need accepted criteria helping the mHealth solutions’ selection, while patients require transparency to trust their use. Information about their evidence, safety and security may be hard to obtain and consensus is lacking on the level of required evidence. The new Medical Device Regulation is more stringent than its predecessor, yet its scope does not span all intended uses and several difficulties remain. The European Society of Cardiology Regulatory Affairs Committee set up a Task Force to explore existing assessment frameworks and clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence. This knowledge was used to propose criteria with which HCPs could evaluate mHealth solutions spanning diagnostic support, therapeutics, remote follow-up and education, specifically for cardiac rhythm management, heart failure and preventive cardiology. While curated national libraries of health apps may be helpful, their requirements and rigour in initial and follow-up assessments may vary significantly. The recently developed CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2 health app quality assessment framework has the potential to address this issue and to become a widely used and efficient tool to help drive decision-making internationally. The Task Force would like to stress the importance of co-development of solutions with relevant stakeholders, and maintenance of health information in apps to ensure these remain evidence-based and consistent with best practice. Several general and domain-specific criteria are advised to assist HCPs in their assessment of clinical evidence to provide informed advice to patients about mHealth utilization.

Contributors

Enrico G Caiani
Enrico G Caiani

Author

Polytechnic of Milan Milan , Italy

Britt Borregaard
Britt Borregaard

Author

Odense University Hospital Odense , Denmark

Giuseppe Boriani
Giuseppe Boriani

Author

Modena Polyclinic Modena University Hospital Modena , Italy

Hans-Peter Brunner La Rocca
Hans-Peter Brunner La Rocca

Author

Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC) Maastricht , Netherlands (The)

Paul Dendale
Paul Dendale

Author

Hasselt University Hasselt , Belgium

Deirdre A Lane
Deirdre A Lane

Author

University of Liverpool Liverpool , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Lis Neubeck
Lis Neubeck

Author

Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Gianfranco Parati
Gianfranco Parati

Author

University of Milan Bicocca Milan , Italy

Chris Plummer
Chris Plummer

Author

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Giuseppe Rosano
Giuseppe Rosano

Author

St Georges Medical School London , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

ESC 365 is supported by