Back

Leadless vs. transvenous pacemaker strategy following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

13 April 2026 (08:00 - 18:15)
Organised by: Logo
Congress Presentation Part of: Poster session (2): device therapy Device Complications and Lead Extraction EHRA Premium Access EHRA 2026 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

About the speaker

Photo
Mr Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho

Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, Sao Paulo (Brazil)

210 More presentations in this session

Presentation thumbnail
Genetic variants and device upgrade in young pacemaker recipients
Doctor J. Sanchez Moreno (Almeria, ES)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Electrocardiographic repolarization changes following conduction system pacing in pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy
Doctor A. Sahin (Konya, TR)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Experiences with implantable loop recorders in syncope patients
Mr A. Oinonen (Helsinki, FI)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Forcecardiography as a non-invasive predictor of echocardiographic parameters in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a preliminary study
Doctor V. Pergola (Naples, IT)
Abstract
Presentation thumbnail
Diagnostic work-up and clinical characteristics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors with ICD implantation: a prospective Danish study
Mr C. Hansen (Copenhagen, DK) Doctor B. Winkel (Copenhagen, DK)
Abstract

Access the full session

Session thumbnail
Poster session (2): device therapy

The Event

Event poster

EHRA 2026

13 April 2026 08:00 CET
You may be interested in
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
A comparison of leadless and conventional transvenous pacemakers in elderly patients: short-term outcomes systematic review and meta-analysis
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Leadless pacemaker implantation versus conventional transvenous cardiac pacing early after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a safe and relevant option?
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Comparative safety outcomes of leadless versus transvenous cardiac pacemaker: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources