The hope and the hype of artificial intelligence for syncope management

European Heart Journal - Digital Health

26 June 2025
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals ARRHYTHMIAS AND DEVICE THERAPY CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS Arrhythmias, General Public Health and Health Economics OTHER Training and Education Syncope and Bradycardia

Abstract

AbstractAims

Syncope remains a diagnostic challenge despite advancements in testing and treatment. Cardiac syncope is an independent predictor of mortality and can be difficult to distinguish from other causes of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). This paper explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the evaluation and management of patients with syncope.

Methods and results

We conducted a literature review and incorporated the opinions of experts in the fields of syncope and AI. The cause of TLOC is often unclear, hospitalization criteria are ambiguous, diagnostic tests are frequently non-informative, and assessments are costly. Patients are left with unanswered questions and limited guidance. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to optimize syncope evaluation by processing large data sets, detecting imperceptible patterns, and assisting clinicians. However, AI has limitations, including errors, lack of human empathy, and uncertain clinical utility. Liability issues further complicate its integration. We present three viewpoints: (i) AI is crucial for advancing syncope management; (ii) AI can enhance the patient experience; and (iii) AI in syncope care is inevitable.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence may improve syncope diagnosis and management, particularly through machine learning–based test interpretation and wearable device data. However, it has yet to surpass human clinical judgment in complex decision-making. Current challenges include gaps in understanding syncope mechanisms, AI interpretability, generalizability, and clinical integration. Standardized diagnostic approaches, real-world validation, and curated data sets are essential for progress. Artificial intelligence may enhance efficiency and communication but raises concerns regarding confidentiality, bias, inequities, and legal implications.

Contributors

Martin H Ruwald
Martin H Ruwald

Author

Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark

Vassilios Vassilikos
Vassilios Vassilikos

Author

Hippokration General Hospital of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki , Greece

Artur Fedorowski
Artur Fedorowski

Author

Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm , Sweden

Richard Sutton
Richard Sutton

Author

Imperial College London London , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Win-Kuang Shen
Win-Kuang Shen

Author

Mayo Clinic Hospital Phoenix , United States of America

Madeleine Johansson
Madeleine Johansson

Author

Lund University Malmo , Sweden

Rakesh Gopinathannair
Rakesh Gopinathannair

Author

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park , United States of America

ESC 365 is supported by