Back
EACVI Premium Access

MR is better than PET imaging for assessing myocardial perfusion - PRO.

Session: MR vs PET imaging in cardiovascular disease: debate
Topic: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR)
Speaker: Professor J. Moon (London, GB)
Event: EACVI - Best of Imaging 2020

Congress Presentation

Add to my library

Like

About the speaker

Professor James Moon

Barts Heart Centre, London (United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland)
30 presentations
7 followers

3 more presentations in this session

MR is better than PET imaging for assessing myocardial perfusion - CONTRA.

Speaker: Professor W. Jaber (Cleveland, US)

Access
Slides
Video
Like
Thumbnail

MR is better than PET imaging for assessing myocardial perfusion - Rebuttal.

Access
Video
Like
Thumbnail

MR vs PET imaging in cardiovascular disease - Discussion.

Access
Video
Like
Thumbnail

Access the full session

MR vs PET imaging in cardiovascular disease: debate

Speakers: Professor J. Moon, Professor W. Jaber
Access
Video
Like
Thumbnail

About the event

Image

EACVI - Best of Imaging 2020

11 December - 12 December 2020

Sessions Presentations

Congress
logo Image

ESC 365 is supported by

bristol-myers-squibb Explore sponsored resources
novartis Explore sponsored resources