Randomized trial of low-dose, ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis or heparin for pulmonary embolism

Cardiovascular Research

30 January 2026
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES, ACUTE CARDIAC CARE Acute Cardiac Care Interventional Cardiology VALVULAR, MYOCARDIAL, PERICARDIAL, PULMONARY, CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Embolism, Right Heart Failure

Abstract

AbstractAims

Intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with increased risk of haemodynamic deterioration and death, but balancing the risk of thrombolytics or catheter-based treatment and efficacy has been challenging. This trial compared the additional efficacy of catheter-based ultrasound low-dose thrombolysis (USAT) over intravenous low-dose thrombolysis or heparin alone.

Methods and results

In an investigator-initiated randomized clinical multicentre trial, we randomized 210 adult patients with acute, intermediate high-risk PE admitted to emergency departments in two regions of Denmark. Patients were allocated 1:1:1 to one of three treatment strata: low-dose thrombolysis (20 mg alteplase administered over 6 h) by USAT, by intravenous administration, or heparin alone. The efficacy of the interventions was assessed by comparing the refined Modified Miller Score, rmMS, (0–40 points, higher score indicating higher thrombus burden) from CT angiographies performed at baseline and 48–96 h post-randomization. Two comparisons were investigated: the reduction of rmMS with low-dose thrombolysis (USAT or intravenously) compared to heparin alone and the reduction of rmMS with low-dose thrombolysis administered by USAT compared to the intravenous route. The safety endpoint included the risk of bleeding.

We included 210 patients with acute PE, 49% were female, the mean age was 70 (IQR 62–76), and the mean body mass index was 30 (26–34). Compared to heparin alone, low-dose thrombolysis reduced the rmMS by 3.6 points (95% CI 2.2–5.0, P < 0.001), but the reduction in rmMS was not different in the ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) vs. the intravenous route, mean difference −0.1 (95% CI: −1.9–1.7), P = 0.88. Bleeding complications were numerically more frequent with low-dose thrombolysis, albeit not statistically significant. No differences in other outcomes were observed.

Conclusion

Low-dose thrombolysis reduced thrombus burden more than heparin alone in patients with acute intermediate high-risk PE. However, USAT did not show greater thrombus reduction than intravenous thrombolysis. The rate of death and risk of bleeding complications were increased with low-dose thrombolysis.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04088292.

Contributors

Sebastian Wiberg
Sebastian Wiberg

Author

Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark

Rikke Sørensen
Rikke Sørensen

Author

Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark

Christian Hassager
Christian Hassager

Author

Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark

ESC 365 is supported by