Comparative clinical profiles and outcomes of prior vs. concurrently diagnosed atrial fibrillation in acute ischaemic stroke: the implication of diagnosis timing
EP Europace Journal

Abstract
Based on the diagnostic sequence in relation to stroke, a recent classification of atrial fibrillation (AF) categorizes AF into known AF (KAF) and AF detected after stroke or transient ischaemic attack (AFDAS). However, relatively little is known about AF ‘concurrently diagnosed with stroke’—perhaps the ‘grey zone’ of AF between KAF and AFDAS, which has been less characterized in terms of its resemblance to clinical characteristics and outcomes compared with AFDAS or KAF.
Patients with AF who were admitted for acute ischaemic stroke (IS) in 2010–20 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics and net clinical outcome (NCO)—the composite of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, hospitalization or emergency department visits for cardiovascular events, and death—were compared between AF diagnosed before stroke (prior AF) and incident AF diagnosed concurrently with IS (AFDCS). A total of 720 patients with AF and acute IS (mean age, 72.5 ± 10.1 years; 60.3% male) were included: prior AF, 62.6% (
Prior AF and AFDCS have distinctive clinical profiles supporting AF is a disease of continuum according to its diagnostic vicinity to the IS. In terms of recurrent IS, AFDCS has a comparable risk with prior AF, indicating the importance of early detection and integrated management of AF for patients with IS.
Contributors

Hyo-Jeong Ahn
Author

Young-Hae Go
Author

Gregory Y H Lip
Author
University of Liverpool Liverpool , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
You may be interested in






