Strategy optimization for the combined procedure of left atrial appendage occlusion plus catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (COMBINATION): a multi-center, randomized study

European Heart Journal

28 October 2024
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals

Abstract

AbstractBackground

The long-term efficacy and safety of combining left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) plus catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a single procedure have been established. However, the optimal combining strategy has not been well elucidated.

Objective

To determine the impact of different combining strategies on long-term clinical outcomes.

Methods

In this prospective multicenter study, patients with non-valvular AF referred for the combining procedure were randomly assigned to the ablation-first or occlusion-first groups at a 1:1 ratio. We evaluated the outcomes of LAAC with a Watchman device and CA using a contact-force sensing catheter during long-term follow-up.

Results

Of the 202 randomized patients, 194(96.0%) completed the trial with 97 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. All procedures were accomplished with acute successful LAAC and restoration of sinus rhythm. Incidences of periprocedural complications were similar. Higher chronic peri-device leak (PDL, 15.5% vs 5.2%, P=0.031) and device-related thrombus (DRT, 8.2% vs 1.0%, P=0.035) rates were observed in the ablation-first group. The event-free survival rate of the primary endpoint (composite of stroke/transient ischemic attack, thromboembolism, clinically-relevant bleeding, cardiovascular rehospitalization/death) was significantly higher in the occlusion-first group (83.5% vs 71.1%, log-rank P=0.036, HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29-0.95) during a median 2.5-year follow-up. Patients with male gender and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score were at lower risk in the subgroup analysis. Long-term freedoms from AF (77.3% vs 63.5%, log-rank P=0.039) and atrial tachyarrhythmias (70.1% vs 55.7%, log-rank P=0.044) were higher in the occlusion-first group, respectively.

Conclusions

The occlusion-first approach is recommended for combined procedures where a plug-like device is implanted due to its superior long-term clinical benefits.

Flowchart of the COMBINATION trial

Incidences of primary endpoint

Contributors

X F Du
X F Du

Author

Ningbo First Hospital Ningbo , China

H M Chu
H M Chu

Author

Ningbo First Hospital Ningbo , China

B Yang
B Yang

Author

Z B Ruan
Z B Ruan

Author

Q Chen
Q Chen

Author

S M Tao
S M Tao

Author

H L Lai
H L Lai

Author

R Q Xie
R Q Xie

Author

P Ye
P Ye

Author

X H Zhou
X H Zhou

Author

Y D Li
Y D Li

Author

J P Li
J P Li

Author

Y J Zhao
Y J Zhao

Author

ESC 365 is supported by