Prognostic significance of pre-procedure wall shear stress in the ascending aorta in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Accurate prognostication before the procedure is challenging in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Recently, blood flow dynamics assessed by four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow CMR) showed a significant reduction in average wall shear stress (WSS) in the ascending aorta (AAo) after TAVR. However, the prognostic value of pre-procedure average WSS in the AAo is controversial.

We aimed to investigate whether pre-procedure average WSS was associated with clinical outcomes in patients with AS undergoing TAVR.

We prospectively examined 159 consecutive AS patients who underwent TAVR (57 males, mean age 83.6 ± 4.7 years, median left ventricular ejection fraction 63.4%) between May 2018 and May 2022. We assessed average WSS in the AAo before TAVR using 4D-flow CMR. We divided the patients into high WSS (≥6.60 Pa, n = 79) and low WSS (<6.60 Pa, n = 80) groups according to the median value of pre-TAVR WSS. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure.

Patients with high WSS had lower age compared to those with low WSS. There were no significant differences on sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, serum albumin, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction, mean transaortic valvular gradient, annulus area in aortic valve and AAo diameter between the groups. During a median follow-up period of 19.8 months (interquartile range 6.0-37.1), the primary outcome more frequently occurred in patients with low WSS than in those with high WSS (28% vs 5%, P <0.001) (Figure 1). A multivariable Cox regression showed that lower WSS independently associated with increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.91, P <0.001), even after adjustment for significant prognostic covariates including age, sex, serum albumin, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease and malignancy, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Predictive performance for the primary outcome was improved when adding the value of WSS in the AAo to representative prognostic factors (c-index 0.81 95%CI 0.72-0.90 vs. 0.77 95%CI 0.67-0.88) (Figure 2).

In patients with AS who underwent TAVR, lower average WSS in the AAo before procedure was associated with higher risk of worse clinical outcomes, suggesting that pre-TAVR average WSS in the AAo would be a surrogate marker and useful for the risk stratification.

Survival analysis for primary outcome