Impact of myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term prognosis
European Heart Journal

Abstract
The most appropriate definition of perioperative myocardial infarction (pMI) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its impact on clinically relevant long-term events is controversial. We aimed to (i) analyse the incidence of pMI depending on various current definitions in a ‘real-life’ setting of CABG surgery and (ii) determine the long-term prognosis of patients with pMI depending on current definitions.
A consecutive cohort of 2829 coronary artery disease patients undergoing CABG from two tertiary university centres with the presence of serial perioperative cardiac biomarker measurements (cardiac troponin and creatine kinase-myocardial band) were retrospectively analysed. The incidence and prognostic impact of pMI were assessed according to (i) the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (4UD), (ii) the definition of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), and (iii) the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and repeat revascularization; secondary endpoints were mortality at 30 days and during 5-year follow-up. There was a significant difference in the occurrence of pMI (49.5% SCAI vs. 2.9% 4UD vs. 2.6% ARC). The 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and ARC criteria remained strong independent predictors of all-cause mortality at 30 days [4UD: odds ratio (OR) 12.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.00–29.67;
Incidence and prognosis of pMI differ markedly depending on the underlying definition of myocardial infarction for patients undergoing CABG. Isolated biomarker release-based definitions (such as troponin) were not associated with pMI relevant to prognosis. Additional signs of ischaemia detected by new electrocardiographic abnormalities, regional wall motion abnormalities, or coronary angiography should result in rapid action in everyday clinical practice.
Contributors

L Pölzl
Author

M Thielmann
Author

S Cymorek
Author

F Nägele
Author

J Hirsch
Author

M Graber
Author

N Sappler
Author

J Eder
Author

S Staggl
Author

F Theurl
Author

H Abfalterer
Author

S J Reinstadler
Author

J Holfeld
Author

A Griesmacher
Author

H Ulmer
Author

M Grimm
Author

E Ruttmann-Ulmer
Author

A Ruhparwar
Author

C Gollmann-Tepeköylü
Author
You may be interested in


