Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by interventricular delay: how to choose between biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing

EP Europace Journal

24 May 2024
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals

Abstract

AbstractBackground

Biventricular pacing (BIV) is gold standard for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Thirty % of patients result non responder to CRT. Conduction system pacing (CSP) represents a feasible alternative. Interventricular conduction delay (IVCD), as electrical desynchrony marker, is a CRT response predictor.

The aim of the study was to assess CRT responder’s incidence when it has been achieved choosing best approach between BIV and CSP according to intraoperative IVCD measurement in patients with HFrEF and LBBB.

Methods

Ninety-eight patients have been 1:1 randomized in a standard BIV group (control group, CG) and a group in which CRT approach has been chosen based on IVCD evaluation (study group, SG), as reported in Figure 1. If the right ventricular sensed electrogram (RVs)-left ventricular sensed electrogram (LVs) interval was ≥100 ms, the left ventricular lead was left in its original position; otherwise, the lead was removed and CSP was performed instead, as reported in Figure 2. Clinical, EKG and echocardiographic features have been assessed pre- and 6 months post-implant. Echocardiographic and clinical response have been evaluated.

Results

Twenty-four % of patients in the SG underwent CSP, according to the operative algorithm adopted. CRT responders’ incidence was significantly higher in the SG (echocardiographic criterion: SG 93,9% vs CG 69,8%; clinical criterion SG 87,9% vs CG 62,8%). Patients in SG presented a significant improvement in EF between pre- and post-implant and a significantly reduced End Diastolic Volumes and End Systolic Volumes vs CG. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed that enrolment in SG was the only factor consistently associated to CRT response.

Conclusion

Intraoperative evaluation of IVCD may guide the choice of the best resynchronization approach between BIV and CSP, allowing to achieve a significant improvement of CRT responders’ rate.

Contributors

C Marallo
C Marallo

Author

San Donato Hospital of Arezzo Arezzo , Italy

F L Federico Landra
F L Federico Landra

Author

Santa Croce E Carle Hospital Cuneo , Italy

M C Maurizio Collantoni
M C Maurizio Collantoni

Author

University Hospital of Siena Siena , Italy

S T Simone Taddeucci
S T Simone Taddeucci

Author

Livorno Hospital Livorno , Italy

S L Stefano Lunghetti
S L Stefano Lunghetti

Author

University Hospital of Siena Siena , Italy

D M Daniele Menci
D M Daniele Menci

Author

Belcolle Hospital Viterbo , Italy

L M Luca Martini
L M Luca Martini

Author

Polyclinic Santa Maria alle Scotte Siena , Italy

A S Amato Santoro
A S Amato Santoro

Author

University Hospital of Siena Siena , Italy

ESC 365 is supported by