Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions

European Heart Journal

5 April 2021
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES, ACUTE CARDIAC CARE Interventional Cardiology BASIC SCIENCE

Abstract

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by coronary physiology provides symptomatic benefit and improves patient outcomes. Nevertheless, over one-fourth of patients still experience recurrent angina or major adverse cardiac events following the index procedure. Coronary angiography, the current workhorse for evaluating PCI efficacy, has limited ability to identify suboptimal PCI results. Accumulating evidence supports the usefulness of immediate post-procedural functional assessment. This review discusses the incidence and possible mechanisms behind a suboptimal physiology immediately after PCI. Furthermore, we summarize the current evidence base supporting the usefulness of immediate post-PCI functional assessment for evaluating PCI effectiveness, guiding PCI optimization, and predicting clinical outcomes. Multiple observational studies and post hoc analyses of datasets from randomized trials demonstrated that higher post-PCI functional results are associated with better clinical outcomes as well as a reduced rate of residual angina and repeat revascularization. As such, post-PCI functional assessment is anticipated to impact patient management, secondary prevention, and resource utilization. Pre-PCI physiological guidance has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and reduce health care costs. Whether similar benefits can be achieved using post-PCI physiological assessment requires evaluation in randomized clinical outcome trials.

Contributors

Jiayue Huang
Jiayue Huang

Author

Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai , China

David Joel Cohen
David Joel Cohen

Author

Cardiovascular Research Institute New York City , United States of America

Niels Ramsing Holm
Niels Ramsing Holm

Author

Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus , Denmark

Bo Xu
Bo Xu

Author