Prognostically relevant periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction associated with percutaneous coronary interventions: a Consensus Document of the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

European Heart Journal

31 May 2021
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals Interventional Cardiology

Abstract

Abstract

A substantial number of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experience periprocedural myocardial injury or infarction. Accurate diagnosis of these PCI-related complications is required to guide further management given that their occurrence may be associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Due to lack of scientific data, the cut-off thresholds of post-PCI cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation used for defining periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction, have been selected based on expert consensus opinions, and their prognostic relevance remains unclear. In this Consensus Document from the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), we recommend, whenever possible, the measurement of baseline (pre-PCI) cTn and post-PCI cTn values in all CCS patients undergoing PCI. We confirm the prognostic relevance of the post-PCI cTn elevation >5× 99th percentile URL threshold used to define type 4a myocardial infarction (MI). In the absence of periprocedural angiographic flow-limiting complications or electrocardiogram (ECG) and imaging evidence of new myocardial ischaemia, we propose the same post-PCI cTn cut-off threshold (>5× 99th percentile URL) be used to define prognostically relevant ‘major’ periprocedural myocardial injury. As both type 4a MI and major periprocedural myocardial injury are strong independent predictors of all-cause mortality at 1 year post-PCI, they may be used as quality metrics and surrogate endpoints for clinical trials. Further research is needed to evaluate treatment strategies for reducing the risk of major periprocedural myocardial injury, type 4a MI, and MACE in CCS patients undergoing PCI.

Contributors

Heerajnarain Bulluck
Heerajnarain Bulluck

Author

Leeds Teaching Hospitals Leeds , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Emanuele Barbato
Emanuele Barbato

Author

Sant Andrea Hospital Rome , Italy

Raffaele De Caterina
Raffaele De Caterina

Author

University of Pisa Pisa , Italy

Sean M Davidson
Sean M Davidson

Author

University College London London , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Mariann Gyöngyösi
Mariann Gyöngyösi

Author

Medical University of Vienna Vienna , Austria

Joost P G Sluijter
Joost P G Sluijter

Author

University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht , Netherlands (The)

Gabor G Toth
Gabor G Toth

Author

Medical University of Graz Graz , Austria

Allan S Jaffe
Allan S Jaffe

Author

Mayo Clinic Rochester , United States of America

Derek J Hausenloy
Derek J Hausenloy

Author

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore Singapore , Singapore

ESC 365 is supported by