Educational needs in cardio-oncology: an international survey by the COOL group of the ESC council of cardio-oncology

EHJ - Open

24 September 2026
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY OTHER European Society of Cardiology Training and Education

Abstract

AbstractAims

Cardio-oncology has emerged as a rapidly growing discipline of cardiology. Despite its clinical relevance, structured education remains limited across medical curricula. The Cardio-Oncologists Of tomorrow Leaders (COOL) group of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Council of Cardio-Oncology conducted an international survey to assess the current state of cardio-oncology training opportunities and perceived needs among healthcare professionals.

Methods and results

An anonymized, web-based survey was distributed to cardiologists, cardiology residents and other healthcare professionals treating patients with cancer. A total of 398 respondents completed this survey (mean age 44 ± 12 years; 60% female; 73% board-certified cardiologists). Only 10% reported exposure to cardio-oncology during medical school, and 17% during residency. The majority (>70%) indicated no structured cardio-oncology training opportunities at their institution, with national cardio-oncology programmes available to only 19% of them. Respondents identified the ESC and national cardiac societies (72%) as main stakeholders responsible for developing educational initiatives. Most participants preferred fellowships at centres of excellence (56%), webinars (53%) and university certifications (51%) as learning formats. A strong consensus (over 85%) emerged that all general cardiologists should be familiar with key cardio-oncology principles, including diagnosis and risk-stratification of cardiotoxicity. Responses differed across respondents’ training status, work setting (academic vs. non-academic) and country.

Conclusion

In parallel with the general growth of the field, there is increasing need of structured and harmonized training in cardio-oncology, including during medical education. Interpretation of results is however, limited by possible selection bias and the absence of a defined denominator, which precluded calculation of response rate.

Contributors

Mariana Mirabel
Mariana Mirabel

Author

Montsouris Mutualist Institute Paris , France

Massimiliano Camilli
Massimiliano Camilli

Author

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome , Italy

Maria Clara Llamedo
Maria Clara Llamedo

Author

Royal Brompton Hospital London , United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Trecy Gonçalves
Trecy Gonçalves

Author

University Health Network of Toronto Toronto , Canada

Madeleine Johansson
Madeleine Johansson

Author

Lund University Malmo , Sweden

Dimitrios Farmakis
Dimitrios Farmakis

Author

National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens , Greece

Teresa Lopez Fernandez
Teresa Lopez Fernandez

Author

La Paz University Hospital Madrid , Spain