Back

Comparing LV lead performance and procedure-related complications: transvenous vs epicardial leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy

11 May 2024 (08:00 - 20:00)
Organised by: Logo
Congress Presentation Part of: ePosters in arrhythmias and device therapy 8 Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) HFA Premium Access Heart Failure 2024 Heart Failure Association (HFA)

About the speaker

Photo
Doctor Margarida Castro

Hospital Guimaraes, Guimaraes (Portugal)

6 More presentations in this session

Presentation thumbnail
From reduced to normal left ventricular ejection fraction: what makes a super-responder to CRT?
Doctor L. Pinheiro (Guimaraes, PT)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
The learning curve of left bundle branch area pacing: feasibility, safety, acute success rates and echocardiographic assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony
Doctor M. Castro (Guimaraes, PT)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure: single-centre experience.
Doctor I. Franco Fernandez (Madrid, ES)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Assessing the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: a comparative analysis between transvenous and epicardial leads.
Doctor M. Castro (Guimaraes, PT)
Abstract Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Differential outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy based on heart failure etiology
Doctor A. Ribeiro Teixeira (Lisbon, PT)
Abstract Slides Video

Access the full session

Session thumbnail
ePosters in arrhythmias and device therapy 8

The Event

Event poster

Heart Failure 2024

11 May - 14 May 2024
You may be interested in
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Assessing the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: a comparative analysis between transvenous and epicardial leads.
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Comparative analysis of clinical adverse outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy: transvenous lead vs epicardial lead
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Intracardiac leadless pacemaker: long term safety over traditional pacemakers. a systematic review and meta-analysis

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources