How to prescribe aerobic interval exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: The SAINTEX-CAD Study

5 November 2018
Organised by: Logo
Practice Tools EAPC Member How-to Articles

The aim of this article is to provide practical guidelines for the implementation of IT in patients with CAD, based on our hands-on experience in the SAINTEX-CAD study.[5,6]

References

  1. Townsend N, Nichols M, Scarborough P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe – epidemiological update 2015. Eur Heart J 2015; 36(40): 2696-2705.
  2. GBD 2013 Mortality and causes of death collaborators. Global, regional and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 385(9963): 117-171.
  3. Vanhees L, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Prognostic value of training-induced change in peak exercise capacity in patients with myocardial infarcts and patients with coronary bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76(14): 1014-1019.
  4. Pattyn N, Cornelissen VA, Buys R, et al. Are aerobic interval training and continuous training isocaloric in coronary artery disease patients? Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23(14): 1486-1495.
  5. Conraads VM, Pattyn N, De Maeyer C, et al. Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study. Int J Cardiol 2015; 179: 203-210.
  6. Conraads VM, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Pattyn N, et al. Rationale and design of a randomized trial on the effectiveness of aerobic interval training in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study.
  7. Swain DP, Franklin BA. Comparison of cardioprotective benefits of vigorous versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97(1): 141-147.
  8. Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Tofler GH, et la. Triggering of acute myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion. Protection against triggering by regular exertion. Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(23): 1677-1683.
  9. Siscovick DS, Weis NS, Fletcher RH, et al. The incidence of primary cardiac arrest during vigorous exercise. N Engl J Med 1984; 311(14): 874-877.
  10. Rognmo Ø, Moholdt T, Bakken H, et al. Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation 2012; 126(12): 1436-1440.
  11. Levinger I, Shaw CS, Stepto NK, et al. What doesn’t kill you makes you fitter: A systematic review of high-intensity interval exercise for patients with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2015; 9: 53-63.
  12. Gayda M, Ribeiro PA, Juneau M, et al. Comparison of different forms of exercise training in patients with cardiac disease: Where does high-intensity interval training fit? Can J Cardiol 2016; 32(4): 485-494.
  13. Pattyn N, Coeckelberghs E, Buys R, et al. Aerobic interval training vs. moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2014; 44(5): 687-700.
  14. Pattyn N, Beckers PJ, Cornelissen VA, et al. The effect of aerobic interval training and continuous training on exercise capacity and its determinants. Acta Cardiol; Accepted 2016.
  15. Yamamoto S, Hotta K, Ota E, et al. Effects of resistance training on muscle strength, exercise capacity, and mobility in middle-aged and elderly patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Cardiol 2016; 68(2): 125-134.
  16. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Mayer-Berger W, Meister ER, et al.; German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Recommendations for resistance exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. Recommendations of the German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004; 11(4): 352-361