Artificial intelligence–based ECG as a triage tool for acute myocardial infarction: a diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis

European Heart Journal - Digital Health

29 August 2026
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES, ACUTE CARDIAC CARE Acute Coronary Syndromes Research Methodology IMAGING Echocardiography Interventional Cardiology

Abstract

Abstract

Early identification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging, particularly in non-ST-segment elevation presentations and occluded myocardial infarction, where conventional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation has limited sensitivity. Artificial intelligence–enabled ECG (AI-ECG) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance early triage and diagnostic accuracy. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-enabled ECG algorithms for the detection of AMI, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), across diverse clinical settings. This diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261292271). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through January 2026. Studies evaluating AI-based ECG models for AMI detection and reporting sufficient data to reconstruct 2 × 2 contingency tables were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated using random-effects models (restricted maximum likelihood). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed for STEMI and NSTEMI Ten observational studies comprising 94 510 participants were included. For overall AMI detection,. AI-ECG demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI, 79.7–94.8) and specificity of 96% (95% CI, 91.2–98.2). The pooled NPV was 98.7% (95% CI, 94.1–99.7), and the pooled PPV was 73.3% (95% CI, 50.2–88.2). The SROC AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92–0.98). In STEMI, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 94.4% and 97.5%, respectively (AUC 0.98). In NSTEMI, pooled sensitivity was lower at 65.0%, with specificity of 87.5% and an AUC of 0.71. Heterogeneity was substantial, particularly among NSTEMI cohorts. AI-enabled ECG demonstrates high sensitivity and consistently excellent negative predictive value for AMI detection, supporting its role as a scalable, non-invasive triage adjunct at first medical contact. These findings highlight the potential of AI-ECG to facilitate early rule-out strategies and improve prioritization of patients requiring urgent ischaemic evaluation. Beyond diagnostic accuracy, AI-ECG may support probabilistic risk stratification and integration into early clinical decision-making pathways.

Contributors

Giulia Caldeira Gaelzer
Giulia Caldeira Gaelzer

Author

Pontifical Catholic University of Parana Curitiba , Brazil

Mushrin Malik
Mushrin Malik

Author

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston , United States of America

Caroline O Fischer-Bacca
Caroline O Fischer-Bacca

Author

University Center for the Development of Alto Vale - UNIDAVI Rio do Sul , Brazil

Juliana Giorgi
Juliana Giorgi

Author

Albert Einstein Israelite Hospital Sao Paulo , Brazil