Interplay of aortic stenosis flow groups and mitral regurgitation aetiology in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract
Management of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in aortic stenosis (AS) flow groups—high-gradient (HG-AS), classical low-flow low-gradient (cLFLG-AS), and paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (pLFLG-AS)—is debated. Concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) worsens outcomes, but the influence of MR aetiology on AS subtypes is unclear. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MR aetiology and severity on outcomes across AS flow groups in TAVR patients.
A retrospective analysis was performed on 2658 patients undergoing TAVR (2013–21). MR was categorized as atrial functional (aFMR), ventricular functional (vFMR), or primary MR (PMR). Outcomes included 3-year mortality, MR improvement, and symptomatic benefit. Out of 2658 TAVR patients, 531 (20.0%) showed at least moderate MR (MR ≥ 2+) (50.1% male, median age 83.1 years). The fraction of patients with MR ≥ 2+ was highest among cLFLG-AS patients (34.2%). MR aetiology varied among AS subtypes, with mostly vFMR in cLFLG-AS (83.0%) and highest rates of aFMR (43%) and PMR (45%) in pLFLG-AS patients. Three-year mortality was significantly affected by MR severity [hazard ratio (HR) for MR2+ vs. MR < 2 1.62 (1.38–1.90)]. Differences in 3-year mortality were found in high-gradient (HG)-AS [HR 1.52 (1.16–1.98)] and pLFLG-AS patients [HR 1.73 (1.24–2.40)], but not in cLFLG-AS patients [HR 1.21 (0.93–1.56)]. MR improvement after TAVR was commonly found in HG-AS (67.2%) and least often among pLFLG-AS (48.7%,
MR aetiology and severity influence outcomes after TAVR depending on AS flow groups.
Contributors

Antonia Gehlich
Author

Maximilian Tischmacher
Author

Carolin Fröhlich
Author

Konstantin Stark
Author

Magda Haum
Author

Julius Fischer
Author

Lukas Stolz
Author

Kornelia Loew
Author

Hans Theiss
Author

Sven Peterß
Author

Jörg Hausleiter
Author

Simon Deseive
Author



