Intracoronary adjunctive therapies for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis of trials

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

9 December 2025
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals

Abstract

AbstractAims

This network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluates the comparative safety and efficacy of intra-coronary (IC) pharmacological and procedural treatments—on top of balloon angioplasty and stent placement—on clinical outcomes and surrogate endpoints of coronary microvascular obstruction (CMVO) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods and results

Two electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Primary efficacy endpoints included all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Primary safety endpoints included peri-procedural arrhythmias including atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) and ventricular fibrillation/sustained ventricular tachycardia (VF/SVT), any bleeding, and stroke. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the occurrence of post-procedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0–2 and ST-segment resolution. A total of 64 RCTs involving 27 243 patients were included. In mixed comparisons, no treatment significantly reduced the incidence of primary efficacy endpoints compared to conventional primary PCI during a mean follow-up of 8 months. Several treatments significantly reduced the occurrence of post-PCI TIMI 0–2 flow grade [adenosine: 0.40 (odds ratio), (95% Confidence Interval 0.24–0.68); verapamil: 0.22 (0.07–0.69); tirofiban: 0.43 (0.27–0.71); manual thrombus aspiration (TA): 0.61 (0.45–0.82); fibrinolytic + manual TA: 0.24 (0.12–0.48); tirofiban + manual TA: 0.32 (0.14–0.75)], compared to conventional primary PCI. IC administration of tirofiban increased the risk of any bleeding [incidence rate ratio: 1.65 (1.11–2.45)], while IC adenosine increased the risk of peri-procedural AVBs [OR: 2.80 (1.14–6.84)]. Nicorandil reduced the incidence of peri-procedural VF/SVT [OR: 0.31 (0.12–0.81)].

Conclusion

Adjunctive IC treatments during primary PCI do not influence hard clinical outcomes compared to conventional therapy within a mean 8-month follow-up, although several of them lead to an improvement in surrogate endpoints of CMVO.

Study registration number

CRD42023468559

ESC 365 is supported by