
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has become the most diagnosed HF subtype representing a major public health burden with poor clinical outcome. Available treatment options for HFpEF are limited; hence, more in-depth basic/translational research is needed to identify novel therapeutic targets. Preclinical investigations frequently rely on mice and rat models of HFpEF, yet their phenotypic accuracy is often not sufficiently verified. Here, we explore the extent to which rodent models labelled as ‘HFpEF’ reflect clinical diagnostic guidelines. We hypothesized that many basic/translational research articles use the term ‘HFpEF’ for rodent models, though the extent to which they demonstrate HFpEF signs and symptoms according to clinical definitions may be limited.
Using the PubMed database, we identified
Despite many original articles labelling mouse and rat models as ‘HFpEF’, approximately two out of five studies fail to provide sufficient evidence to back this claim. Hence, caution is advised when interpreting mechanistic or interventional findings from studies involving rodent HFpEF models, and phenotypic documentation should be thoroughly assessed by readers and reviewers prior to drawing conclusions on the pathophysiology or treatment of HFpEF.
Contributors

Yamen Adrah
Author

Niklas Hegemann
Author

David Faidel
Author

Mariya M Kucherenko
Author

Wolfgang M Kuebler
Author

Gabriele G Schiattarella
Author
You may be interested in


