Cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction and a wide QRS

European Heart Journal

5 November 2025
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals

Abstract

AbstractBackground

Limited data exist on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of CRT-D compared with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤20%) and a wide QRS complex.

Methods

This study included 820 patients with LVEF ≤20% and QRS duration ≥130 ms, enrolled in five major trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, MADIT-RISK, RAID). The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF) or death. Secondary outcomes included death, first HF event, recurrent HF, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF), and appropriate ICD shocks. Outcomes were stratified by the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB).

Results

Among 508 CRT-D patients (70% LBBB) and 364 ICD patients (72% LBBB), CRT-D vs. ICD was associated with a significant reduction in the 3-year cumulative event rate of HF or death in LBBB patients (20% vs. 40%, p<0.001 [Figure Panel A]) but not in non-LBBB patients (37% vs. 42%, p=0.499 [Figure Panel B]).

Multivariate analysis showed that CRT-D significantly reduced HF or death in LBBB patients (HR=0.46, p<0.001) but showed no benefit in non-LBBB patients (HR=1.16, p=0.566; p-value for interaction =0.001). Similarly, in LBBB patients, CRT-D was associated with reductions in death (HR=0.60, p=0.069), first HF event (HR=0.42, p<0.001), recurrent HF (HR=0.39, p<0.001), VT/VF (HR=0.64, p=0.011), and appropriate ICD shocks (HR=0.35, p<0.001). In contrast, CRT-D did not significantly reduce any of these outcomes in non-LBBB patients (p>0.1 for all comparisons; p for interaction device-by-LBBB <0.05 for all).

Conclusions

CRT-D provides significant clinical benefits in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction and LBBB. These findings should be considered when evaluating the need for advanced HF intervention therapies in this population.

Contributors

G Golovchiner
G Golovchiner

Author

Rabin Medical Centre Petah Tikva , Israel

A Erez
A Erez

Author

S Mcnitt
S Mcnitt

Author

M Aktas
M Aktas

Author

W Zareba
W Zareba

Author