Cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction and a wide QRS
European Heart Journal

Abstract
Limited data exist on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of CRT-D compared with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤20%) and a wide QRS complex.
This study included 820 patients with LVEF ≤20% and QRS duration ≥130 ms, enrolled in five major trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, MADIT-RISK, RAID). The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF) or death. Secondary outcomes included death, first HF event, recurrent HF, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF), and appropriate ICD shocks. Outcomes were stratified by the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB).
Among 508 CRT-D patients (70% LBBB) and 364 ICD patients (72% LBBB), CRT-D vs. ICD was associated with a significant reduction in the 3-year cumulative event rate of HF or death in LBBB patients (20% vs. 40%, p<0.001 [Figure Panel A]) but not in non-LBBB patients (37% vs. 42%, p=0.499 [Figure Panel B]).
Multivariate analysis showed that CRT-D significantly reduced HF or death in LBBB patients (HR=0.46, p<0.001) but showed no benefit in non-LBBB patients (HR=1.16, p=0.566; p-value for interaction =0.001). Similarly, in LBBB patients, CRT-D was associated with reductions in death (HR=0.60, p=0.069), first HF event (HR=0.42, p<0.001), recurrent HF (HR=0.39, p<0.001), VT/VF (HR=0.64, p=0.011), and appropriate ICD shocks (HR=0.35, p<0.001). In contrast, CRT-D did not significantly reduce any of these outcomes in non-LBBB patients (p>0.1 for all comparisons; p for interaction device-by-LBBB <0.05 for all).
CRT-D provides significant clinical benefits in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction and LBBB. These findings should be considered when evaluating the need for advanced HF intervention therapies in this population.
Contributors

I Goldenberg
Author

K Buturlin
Author

A Erez
Author

G Goldenberg
Author

B Polonsky
Author

S Mcnitt
Author

M Aktas
Author

W Zareba
Author

A Barsheshet
Author


