Passive leg raise echocardiography improves non-invasive diagnosis of HFpEF: A prospective validation against invasive hemodynamics

European Heart Journal

5 November 2025
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals

Abstract

AbstractBackground/Introduction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains difficult to diagnose non-invasively. The Passive Leg Raise (PLR) test with echocardiography provides a rapid, simple non-invasive assessment of stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) reserve, potentially improving HFpEF diagnostics.

Purpose

We aimed to validate echocardiographic CO/SV changes during PLR as a diagnostic tool for HFpEF compared to invasive right heart catheterization (PAWP ≥ 15 mmHg at rest or PAWP ≥ 25 mmHg during exercise).

Methods

Prospective study including 33 patients undergoing simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization. Standard diastolic function parameters (E/e’ mean, TR velocity, LAVI) were recorded. Echocardiographic CO and SV changes were measured during PLR (rest to PLR). A logistic regression model was developed to predict HFpEF using diastolic function parameters alone vs. an enhanced model incorporating CO and SV changes.

Results

Diagnostic Performance of Standard Diastolic Function Parameters, AUC = 0.77 (moderate accuracy). Enhanced Model (Diastolic Parameters + CO and SV Changes During PLR), AUC = 0.90 (significantly improved accuracy, p < 0.05). Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 85% at the optimal threshold (0.285). Predictive Scoring Model Developed: HFpEF Score = (1.89 * E/e' mean) + (0.43 * TR max) + (10 * LAVI) - (7.52 * CO Change) - (8.10 * SV Change) Score > 0.285 predicts HFpEF with high sensitivity.

Conclusion(s)

PLR-induced CO and SV changes significantly enhance the diagnostic accuracy of HFpEF. Adding echocardiographic CO/SV responses to standard diastolic parameters improves AUC from 0.77 to 0.90. This method could offer a non-invasive alternative to right heart catheterization for HFpEF assessment. Further validation with a larger, multi-center cohort is ongoing.

Contributors

S Gerovasileiou
S Gerovasileiou

Author

Hospital Enkoping Medical Center Enkoping , Sweden

E Bjorklund
E Bjorklund

Author

Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala , Sweden

G Wikstrom
G Wikstrom

Author

Uppsala University Uppsala , Sweden

F A Flachskampf
F A Flachskampf

Author

Uppsala University Uppsala , Sweden