Effectiveness of bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine in individuals with or without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the DAN-RSV trial

European Heart Journal

30 August 2025
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals Public Health and Health Economics

Abstract

AbstractBackground and Aims

It is not known whether the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine reduces outcomes in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim was to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of an RSVpreF vaccine vs no vaccine on respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing ASCVD.

Methods

We conducted a prespecified secondary analysis of the DAN-RSV trial. Adults aged ≥60 years were randomized 1:1 to RSVpreF vaccine or no vaccine. Baseline and outcome data were collected through nationwide registries. The primary outcome was respiratory syncytial virus-related respiratory tract disease hospitalization. The principal major adverse cardiovascular event outcome was a composite of hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure. Heterogeneity in VE was assessed among participants with and without ASCVD.

Results

The incidence rate of almost all outcomes was higher in participants with pre-existing ASCVD (n = 14 241) vs those without (n = 117 035). Vaccine effectiveness was generally consistent by ASCVD status (Pinteraction ≥ .05 for all but one interaction). Among persons without and with ASCVD, VE for the primary outcome was 80.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.3–96.3] vs 100.0% (95% CI, −141.3 to 100.0), respectively (Pinteraction > .99). Vaccine effectiveness for major adverse cardiovascular events was 9.3% (95% CI, −15.1 to 28.6) in participants without, and 12.0% (95% CI, −34.6 to 43.3) in participants with, pre-existing ASCVD (Pinteraction = .90).

Conclusions

The VE of an RSVpreF vaccine vs no vaccine against respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes was similar among individuals ≥ 60 years of age with pre-existing ASCVD as compared with those without.

Contributors

Manan Pareek
Manan Pareek

Author

Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark

Caroline Espersen
Caroline Espersen

Author

Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital Gentofte , Denmark

Lars Køber
Lars Køber

Author

Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark

Tor Biering-Sørensen
Tor Biering-Sørensen

Author

Gentofte University Hospital Copenhagen , Denmark