Aortic valve replacement vs. conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial
European Heart Journal

Abstract
The question of when and how to treat truly asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function is still subject to debate and ongoing research. Here, the results of extended follow-up of the AVATAR trial are reported (NCT02436655,
The AVATAR trial randomly assigned patients with severe, asymptomatic AS and LV ejection fraction ≥ 50% to undergo either early surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or conservative treatment with watchful waiting strategy. All patients had negative exercise stress testing. The primary hypothesis was that early AVR will reduce a primary composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure (HF), as compared with conservative treatment strategy.
A total of 157 low-risk patients (mean age 67 years, 57% men, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 1.7%) were randomly allocated to either the early AVR group (
The extended follow-up of the AVATAR trial demonstrates better clinical outcomes with early surgical AVR in truly asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LV ejection fraction compared with patients treated with conservative management on watchful waiting.
Contributors

Svetozar Putnik
Author

Bruno R Da Costa
Author

Martin Penicka
Author

Marek A Deja
Author

Martin Kotrc
Author

Radka Kockova
Author

Hrvoje Gasparovic
Author

Nikola Pavlovic
Author

Lazar Velicki
Author

Stefano Salizzoni
Author
A.O.U. Citta Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino Molinette Turin , Italy

Wojtek Wojakowski
Author

Sinisa Gradinac
Author

Michael Laufer
Author

Sara Tomovic
Author

Ivan Busic
Author

Milica Bojanic
Author

Andrea Klasnja
Author

Milos Matkovic
Author

Nikola Boskovic
Author

Katarina Zivic
Author

Miodrag Jovanovic
Author

Serge D Nikolic
Author

Bernard Iung
Author




