Non-HDL cholesterol and residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients with and without diabetes: the Western Denmark Heart Registry

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

21 March 2024
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES, ACUTE CARDIAC CARE Acute Coronary Syndromes PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY Risk Factors and Prevention

Abstract

AbstractAims

Assessment of residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is pivotal for optimizing secondary preventive therapies. This study investigates if non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is associated with residual ASCVD risk in statin-treated ischaemic heart disease (IHD) patients with and without diabetes.

Methods and results

Using the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we identified statin-treated patients with IHD examined by coronary angiography (CAG) from 2011 to 2020. Non-HDL-C was assessed within 1 year after CAG. Outcomes were ASCVD (myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death) and all-cause death. Cox regression analyses obtained hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and hypertension. A total of 42 057 patients were included: 8196 patients with diabetes and 33 861 without diabetes. During the median 4.6 years of follow-up, event rates per 1000 person-years of ASCVD were 28.8 (27.1–30.5) and 17.2 (16.5–17.8) among patients with and without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, the adjusted HRs of ASCVD as compared with non-HDL-C < 25th percentile were 1.0 (0.9–1.2), 1.3 (1.1–1.6), and 1.6 (1.2–2.1) for patients in the 25th–74th, 75th–94th, and ≥95th percentiles. In patients without diabetes, the corresponding adjusted HRs were 1.1 (0.9–1.1), 1.2 (1.1–1.4), and 1.7 (1.4–2.0). Results were consistent across sex, age, clinical presentation, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol strata.

Conclusion

In statin-treated IHD patients with and without diabetes, non-HDL-C, especially above the 75th percentile, is associated with residual cardiovascular risk. These results have implications for secondary prevention, targeting patients who may benefit most from intensified preventive therapy.

ESC 365 is supported by