Combined PVI and LAAC is feasible using RFA or PFA in a canine model despite acute tissue edema in PFA versus RFA

Combined procedure with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using thermal energy followed by left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been used in select patient populations with positive results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal ablation modality that ablates cardiac tissue by irreversible electroporation. The effect of PFA on cardiac tissue and its interaction with a LAAC device in a single procedure has not been studied.

To evaluate using transesophageal echo (TEE) imaging the acute tissue response following ablation by PFA compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and its interaction with the WATCHMAN FLX Pro LAAC device when used in a combined procedure in a healthy canine model.

Nine mongrel canines underwent PVI using either circumferential PFA (FARAPULSE) energy application (n=6) or RFA energy (n=3). TEE imaging was obtained at the time of the procedure before and immediately after ablation energy application. The general appearance and echogenicity of the left lateral ridge was assessed and the os of the left atrial appendage (LAA) was measured in the four standard TEE views (0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees). Decisions about device sizing were made accordingly. PVI was evaluated by entry and exit block in all veins except the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV), which was not ablated. Following ablation, the LAAC device was implanted using TEE and fluoroscopic guidance in all animals and the percentage of compression measured. PASS criteria were assessed before the release of each device. All animals received dual antiplatelet therapy post implant.

PVI was confirmed in all animals (except RIPV which was not targeted for ablation) using PFA and RFA. LAA dimensions (at device landing site) did not change substantially after RF ablation. With PFA, there was evidence of more diffuse edema and decrease in LAA diameter (Table). The LAAC device was implanted successfully after meeting PASS criteria in all animals within 30 minutes post ablation. The device size was decreased following PFA in two (2/6) animals, whereas there was no deviation from baseline measurements in device size for any of the RFA animals. Average LAAC device compression was higher for PFA versus RFA animals (Table). TEE post implant confirmed absence of any peri-device leaks in all animals.

Concomitant PVI using PFA (FARAPULSE) and LAAC (WATCHMAN FLX Pro) is feasible with 100% success and no residual acute peri-device leak. In the canine model, PFA is associated with more diffuse edema compared to RFA, which might affect device sizing. Long term consequences of this acute edema need to be evaluated in serial imaging and future larger clinical trials.

Table