Reverse RV remodeling after isolated tricuspid valve surgery

Impact of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on right ventricular (RV) and atrial (RA) size and function is one of the main determinants of prognosis. However, there is scarce data about the recovery of right chambers after isolated tricuspid valve surgery (ITVS).

Our aim is to evaluate postsurgical changes in right chamber morphofunctional parameters by echocardiography after ITVS.

We selected all the patients that underwent ITVS in our tertiary centre between 2009 and 2022 excluding those with congenital anomalies. Echocardiographic right ventricular classical parameters (RV diameters, RA area, TAPSE and fractional area change (CAF)) as well as myocardial deformation (free wall (FW)- and 4 chambers (4C)- global longitudinal strain (GLS)) were compared in baseline studies, early and late postsurgical periods.

Among the 45 patients included (65 ± 2 years-old, 51% female, TRI-SCORE 2 [1-4]) surgical indication was functional TR in 51%, 29% underwent tricuspid valve repair and 71% replacement. The treatment was considered ineffective (postoperative TR ≥ moderate) in 9%. In the early postsurgical phase (1.9 [1.2 – 3] months) a significant reduction in basal (-17%, p<0.01), mid (-15%, p<0.01) and longitudinal (- 7%, p<0,01) RV diameters as well as RA area (-26%, p<0.01) was noted. These changes persist in the late postoperative period for basal (-16%, p<0.01) and mid (-20%, p<0.01) RV diameters and RA area (-19%, p=0.03). RV function parameters suffer significant reduction in the early phases: TAPSE (-39%, p<0.01), FAC (-24%, p<0.01), FW-GLS (-17.1%, p<0.01) and 4C-GLS (-16.3%, p<0.01). In later stages the major worsening in classical parameters persist: TAPSE (-28%, p=0.01) y FAC (-20%. P=0.01). However, strain variables recover to the baseline values. Postoperative RV reverse remodeling is reflected in Table and Figure.

Postoperative changes in echocardiographic right chambers features after ITVS suggest that myocardial deformation parameters should be the method of choice for follow-up of this surgical procedure.

Table. Comparison of baseline and postsurgical echocardiographic parameters.

Figure. Echocardiographic parameters evolution.

Table