P1010
Association between left atrial fibrosis detected by cardiac magnetic resonance and endocardial electroanatomic mapping in the evaluation of the electrophysiological substrate in atrial fibrillation
EP Europace Journal
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is related to left atrial fibrosis, but its identification by late magnetic resonance imaging (LGE) with gadolinium (LGE) persists in controversy due to heterogeneous results in its correlation with the electroatomic map (EAM) and the difficulty of perform histological studies in humans.
We try to examine the point-by-point association between high density EAM and LGE-MRI using an automatic and reproducible method.
A LGE-MRI was performed in 16 patients prior to ablation. Three different areas were established depending on the intensity of normalized enhancement for each patient according to their blood group with the image intensity ratio (IIR) (healthy <1.20, border area (BZ) ≥1.20 <1.32 and scar ≥1.32). The high density electroanatomic maps of the left atrium (LA) were projected onto the MRI, obtaining an automatic correlation point by point.
The study obtained significant differences (p < 0.001) between voltage (mV) and CV (mm/ms) among healthy, BZ and scar areas, as well a significant inverse correlation (p < 0.001) between voltage and IIR (R=-0.39). It obtained too a significant correlation between CV and IIR (R=-0.24), but this showed a greater correlation in those patients who have the least dilated LA (p = 0.02).
LGE-MRI and EAM showed good correlation in delineating potential pathologic substrate in AF, but left atrium dilation could reduce the performance of the CMR in this task. Conduction velocity could be more sensitive than voltage and LGE-MRI to detect incipient substrate in AF.
Voltage and conduction velocity values Voltage and conduction velocity values in the three areas of the LGE-RMN.Area /IIR Velocity (mm/ms) Voltage (mV) I / <.20 1.036(0.913-1.158) 1.593(1.489-1.696) 2 / ≥1.20 and <1.32 0.722(0.590-0.850) 0.792 (0.649-0,935) 3 / ≥1.32 0.623(0.473-0,733) 0.444(0.245-0.642)
Abstract Figure. Correlation among voltage, VC and LA
