Percutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trials
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract
A 5-year survival of patients with unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis according to the choice of revascularization (percutaneous vs. surgical) remains to be defined.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with a follow-up of at least 5 years were included. All-cause death was the primary endpoint. MACCE [a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization] along with its single components and cardiovascular (CV) death were the secondary ones. Analyses were stratified according to the use of first- vs. last-generation coronary stents. Subgroup comparisons were performed according to SYNTAX score (below or above 33) and to age (using cut-offs of each trial’s subgroup analysis). Four RCTs with 4394 patients were identified: 2197 were treated with CABG, 657 with first generation, and 1540 with last-generation stents. At 5-year rates of all-cause death did not differ [odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.21], as those of CV death and stroke. Coronary artery bypass graft reduced rates of MACCE (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60–0.79), mainly driven by MI (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36–0.65) and revascularization (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.45–0.64). Benefit of CABG for MACCE was consistent, although with different extent, across values of SYNTAX score (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.97 for values < 32 and OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47–0.84 for values ≥ 33) while was not evident for ‘younger’ patients (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.65–1.07 vs. OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51–0.84 for ‘older’ patients).
For patients with ULM disease followed-up for 5 years, no significant difference was observed in all-cause and cardiovascular death between PCI and CABG. Coronary artery bypass graft reduced risk of MI, revascularization, and MACCE especially in older patients and in those with complex coronary disease and a high SYNTAX score.
Contributors

Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
Author
Hospital Molinette of the University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista Turin , Italy

Ovidio De Filippo
Author

Edoardo Elia
Author

Mattia Paolo Doronzo
Author

Pierluigi Omedè
Author

Antonio Montefusco
Author

Mauro Pennone
Author

Stefano Salizzoni
Author
A.O.U. Citta Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino Molinette Turin , Italy

Federico Conrotto
Author

Guglielmo Gallone
Author

Filippo Angelini
Author

Luca Franchin
Author

Francesco Bruno
Author

Massimo Boffini
Author

Mario Gaudino
Author
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Centre New York , United States of America

Mauro Rinaldi
Author

Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Author
