C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19

European Heart Journal

15 January 2021
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES, ACUTE CARDIAC CARE Acute Coronary Syndromes DISEASES OF THE AORTA, PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE, STROKE Peripheral Vascular and Cerebrovascular Disease BASIC SCIENCE

Abstract

AbstractBackground

A systemic inflammatory response is observed in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, are associated with severe disease in bacterial or viral infections. We aimed to explore associations between CRP concentration at initial hospital presentation and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Methods and results

Consecutive adults aged ≥18 years with COVID-19 admitted to a large New York healthcare system between 1 March and 8 April 2020 were identified. Patients with measurement of CRP were included. Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), acute kidney injury (AKI), critical illness, and in-hospital mortality were determined for all patients. Among 2782 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 2601 (93.5%) had a CRP measurement [median 108 mg/L, interquartile range (IQR) 53–169]. CRP concentrations above the median value were associated with VTE [8.3% vs. 3.4%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61–3.36], AKI (43.0% vs. 28.4%; aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.76–2.52), critical illness (47.6% vs. 25.9%; aOR 2.83, 95% CI 2.37–3.37), and mortality (32.2% vs. 17.8%; aOR 2.59, 95% CI 2.11–3.18), compared with CRP below the median. A dose response was observed between CRP concentration and adverse outcomes. While the associations between CRP and adverse outcomes were consistent among patients with low and high D-dimer levels, patients with high D-dimer and high CRP have the greatest risk of adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

Systemic inflammation, as measured by CRP, is strongly associated with VTE, AKI, critical illness, and mortality in COVID-19. CRP-based approaches to risk stratification and treatment should be tested.

Contributors

Jeffrey S Berger
Jeffrey S Berger

Author

New York University School of Medicine New York , United States of America

ESC 365 is supported by