Impact of aortic regurgitation on long-term outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Aortic Regurgitation (AR) may aggravate the clinical course in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) by increasing filling pressures and triggering LV remodelling.

To assess AR's prevalence and long-term prognostic implications in patients with HFpEF.

The study population consisted of 458 consecutive patients (age 77.5±9.2 y, 57.9% females) hospitalized with de novo or worsened HFpEF. Patients with more than moderate aortic and/or mitral valve disease were excluded. Data on cardiovascular death, HF re-hospitalization and their composite (MACE) were collected.

Out of 309 (67.5%) patients with any AR, 156 (34.0%) and 153 (33.5%) had mild-AR and moderate-AR, respectively. The remaining 149 (32.5%) individuals had no-AR. Patients with versus without AR were significantly older with larger LV and LA volumes and a higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction (all p<0.05). During a median follow-up of 33±25 months, a total of 114 patients (24.9%) died from cardiovascular causes, 126 patients (27.5%) were re-hospitalized for HF, while 272 (59.4%) had the composite endpoint (MACE). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, any AR emerged as an only independent predictor of MACE (HR=1.90, 95% CI 1.26–2.87, p=0.002). Mild-AR and Moderate AR increased the risk of MACE by 77% and 92%, respectively, compared to the No-AR (Figure).

In patients with HFpEF, mild-to-moderate AR is highly prevalent, and it seems to identify individuals with worse long-term outcomes. This suggests that even mild AR should be considered a high-risk prognostic marker in patients with HFpEF.

Type of funding sources: None.