Deep vein thrombosis after leadless pacemaker implantation
European Heart Journal

Abstract
A leadless pacemaker has been used widely. The necessity of using large sheath (23 Fr) is one of the disadvantages of implanting leadless pacemaker. There are some reports about deep vein thrombosis (DVT)after leadless pacemaker, but the accurate number of DVT after leadless pacemaker implantation is unknown.
This retrospective study analyzed patients who were implanted leadless pacemaker from January 2018 to August 2022. We included the patients who were conducted ultrasound for DVT both before and after leadless implantation. The primary endpoint was incidence of DVT by ultrasound one day after leadless pacemaker implantation in the leg where sheath was inserted.
89 patients were included in this study. The mean age of this study was 86.2±7.4 years old and 88 patients (99%) were implanted leadless pacemaker from their right femoral vein. 49 patients (55%) took anticoagulant before leadless pacemaker implantation. About the primary endpoint, 12 patients (13.5%: 8 patients without anticoagulant and 4 patients with anticoagulant) had newly asymptomatic DVT. After the univariate analysis, patients with low body weight (OR: 0.90, CI: 0.83–0.98, p=0.011), short height (OR: 0.87, CI: 0.79–0.96, p=0.005) and small diameter of the femoral vein (OR: 0.65, CI: 0.46–0.92, p=0.015) tended to have DVT. The use of anticoagulant did not affect the incidence of DVT (OR: 0.365, CI: 0.10–1.3, p=0.114).
Asymptomatic DVT by ultrasound is found in 13.5% of patients after leadless pacemaker. The small body patients might have easier to have DVT after leadless pacemaker. We should consider performing ultrasound to check for DVT in high-risk patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.
Type of funding sources: None.
Contributors

K T Tobita
Author

M M Murakami
Author

S S Saito
Author

T Hayashi
Author

K S Shishido
Author

N M Moriyama
Author
You may be interested in


