A simplified approach to discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with heart failure using cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial deformation imaging

European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice

12 September 2024
Organised by: Logo
ESC Journals HEART FAILURE Chronic Heart Failure IMAGING Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY Risk Factors and Prevention

Abstract

AbstractAims

Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) shows promise as a marker to detect early heart failure (HF). This study sought to (i) establish cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)–derived LV-GLS cut-offs to differentiate healthy from HF for both acquisition-based and post-processing techniques, (ii) assess agreement, and (iii) provide a method to convert LV-GLS between both techniques.

Methods and results

A secondary analysis of a prospective study enrolling healthy subjects (n = 19) and HF patients (n = 56) was conducted. LV-GLS was measured using fast strain–encoded imaging (fSENC) and feature tracking (FT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to derive and evaluate LV-GLS cut-offs discriminating between healthy, HF with mild deformation impairment (DI), and HF with severe DI. Linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses assessed agreement. Cut-offs discriminating between healthy and HF were identified at −19.3% and −15.1% for fSENC and FT, respectively. Cut-offs of −15.8% (fSENC) and −10.8% (FT) further distinguished mild from severe DI. No significant differences in area under ROC curve were identified between fSENC and FT. Bland–Altman analysis revealed a bias of −4.01%, 95% CI −4.42, −3.50 for FT, considering fSENC as reference. Linear regression suggested a factor of 0.76 to rescale fSENC-derived LV-GLS to FT. Using this factor on fSENC-derived cut-offs yielded rescaled FT LV-GLS cut-offs of −14.7% (healthy vs. HF) and −12% (mild vs. severe DI).

Conclusion

LV-GLS distinguishes healthy from HF with high accuracy. Each measurement technique requires distinct cut-offs, but rescaling factors facilitate conversion. An FT-based LV-GLS ≥ −15% simplifies HF detection in clinical routine.

Contributors

Wensu Chen
Wensu Chen

Author

Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou , China

Tim Friede
Tim Friede

Author

University Medical Centre of Gottingen (UMG) Goettingen , Germany

Sebastian Kelle
Sebastian Kelle

Author

German Heart Centre Berlin Berlin , Germany