Back

Rebuttal - CONTRA

26 May 2018 (15:18 - 15:21)
Organised by:
Congress Presentation Part of: GRAND DEBATE I - Drugs or interventions - The beat goes on Treatment, Other HFA Premium Access Heart Failure 2018

15 More presentations in this session

Presentation thumbnail
Positioning of the topic
Professor E. Braunwald (Boston, US)
Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Opening question
Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Coronary revascularisation provides no meaningful clinical benefit over optimal medical therapy in patients with stable ischaemic heart failure - PRO
Professor J. Cleland (Glasgow, GB)
Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Coronary revascularisation provides no meaningful clinical benefit over optimal medical therapy in patients with stable ischaemic heart failure - CONTRA
Professor E. Velazquez (New Haven, US)
Slides Video
Presentation thumbnail
Rebuttal - PRO
Video

Access the full session

Session thumbnail
GRAND DEBATE I - Drugs or interventions - The beat goes on

The Event

Event poster

Heart Failure 2018

26 May 2018 15:18 CET
You may be interested in
thumbnail
Congress Session
How to manage cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) challenges I
3 April 2022
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
COVID-19 infection causes a high burden of cardiovascular complications - con rebuttal
10 May 2023
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
We should target triglycerides to decrease cardiovascular risk: con
28 August 2023
thumbnail
Congress Session
Great Debate: diuretics in heart failure - friend or foe?
28 August 2023

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources
novo-nordisk Explore sponsored resources

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources
novo-nordisk Explore sponsored resources