Back

Network meta-analysis comparing iFR vs. FFR vs. coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization

27 August 2018 (14:00 - 18:00)
Organised by:
Congress Presentation Part of: Poster Session 5 - Coronary artery disease - Diagnosis, pharmacotherapy and revascularisation 2 Angiography, Invasive Imaging ESC Premium Access ESC Congress 2018

About the speaker

Photo
Doctor Francesco Fioravanti

San Raffaele Hospital, Milan (Italy)

9 More presentations in this session

Presentation thumbnail
Doctor I. El-Battrawy (Bochum, DE)
Abstract
Presentation thumbnail
Doctor S. Kasturi (Hyderabad, IN)
Abstract Slides
Presentation thumbnail
Doctor Y. Liu (Guangzhou, CN)
Abstract Slides
Presentation thumbnail
Ms E. Hartman (Rotterdam, NL)
Abstract
Presentation thumbnail
Mr J. Smit (Leiden, NL)
Abstract Slides

Access the full session

Session thumbnail
Poster Session 5 - Coronary artery disease - Diagnosis, pharmacotherapy and revascularisation 2

The Event

Event poster

ESC Congress 2018

27 August 2018 14:00 CET
You may be interested in
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Fractional flow reserve versus solely angiography-guided revascularisation in coronary artery disease, systematic review and meta-analysis.
1 September 2024
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Comparison of FFR with iFR and QFR in assessment of intermediate coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
1 September 2020
thumbnail
Webinar
Invasive diagnostic assessment of coronary artery disease - IC Core Curriculum 1
13 April 2022
thumbnail
Congress Presentation
Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of revascularization in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease and heart failure
29 June 2021

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources
novo-nordisk Explore sponsored resources

ESC 365 is supported by

novartis Explore sponsored resources
novo-nordisk Explore sponsored resources