P1136
Is there a negative impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
EP Europace Journal

Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment in patients (P) with aortic stenosis. Despite the continuous developments of this procedure, high-grade conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is still a major and common complication of TAVI. Furthermore, long-term chronic right ventricular pacing has been associated with negative effects on ventricular function and heart failure (HF).
to evaluate the long-term impact of PPM after TAVI focusing on mortality and HF hospitalization.
We retrospectively examined P who underwent TAVI with a self-expanding valve from 2009 to 2018 at our institution. All P had pre-procedural clinical evaluation, including ECG, cardiac computed tomographic angiography and transthoracic echocardiography. P with previous PPM were excluded.
265P (57% male, mean age 81.4 years, 20% with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) were analysed. Mean STS score and mean Euroscore II were 6.33% and 7.07%, respectively. Mean transvalvular gradient was 52.78 mmHg and mean aortic valve area 0.67 cm2. Forty-seven P (17%) underwent PPM implantation during the first 30 days after TAVI. P requiring PPM had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, atrial fibrillation and right bundle branch block. During a mean follow-up of 20.3 months, post-TAVI PPM was associated with similar mortality rate (29.8% vs. 25.6%, HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.72-2.29, p = 0.42) and similar cardiovascular mortality (9.8% vs. 6.4%, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.21-2.4, p = 0.59) compared to P without PPM. There were no significant differences in HF hospitalization (4.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.47). Kaplan-Meier curves of total mortality and cardiovascular mortality according to the need for PPM post-TAVI were similar.
In P submitted to TAVI, PPM implantation is a relatively common finding, not associated with higher risk of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization in a long-term follow-up.
Contributors

T J Carvalho Mendonca
Author

L Patricio
Author

M Oliveira
Author

I Rodrigues
Author

G Portugal
Author

R Ramos
Author

D Cacela
Author

P S Cunha
Author

H Kahlbau
Author

I Fragata
Author

J Fragata
Author