Comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance stress T1 mapping and [¹⁵O]H₂O positron emission tomography in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease

To compare cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) measurement of T1 reactivity (ΔT1) with [¹⁵O]H₂O positron emission tomography (PET) measurements of quantitative myocardial perfusion.

Forty-three patients with suspected obstructed coronary artery disease underwent [¹⁵O]H₂O PET and CMR at 1.5-T, including rest and adenosine stress T1 mapping (ShMOLLI) and late gadolinium enhancement to rule out presence of scar tissue. ΔT1 was determined for the three main vascular territories and compared with [¹⁵O]H₂O PET-derived regional stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). ΔT1 showed a significant but poor correlation with stress MBF (R² = 0.04, P = 0.03) and MFR (R² = 0.07, P = 0.004). Vascular territories with impaired stress MBF (i.e. ≤2.30 mL/min/g) demonstrated attenuated ΔT1 compared with vascular territories with preserved stress MBF (2.9 ± 2.2% vs. 4.1 ± 2.2%, P = 0.008). In contrast, ΔT1 did not differ between vascular territories with impaired (i.e. <2.50) and preserved MFR (3.2 ± 2.6% vs. 4.0 ± 2.1%, P = 0.25). Receiver operating curve analysis of ΔT1 resulted in an area under the curve of 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.75, P = 0.009] for diagnosing impaired stress MBF and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53–0.71, P = 0.07) for diagnosing impaired MFR.

CMR stress T1 mapping has poor agreement with [¹⁵O]H₂O PET measurements of absolute myocardial perfusion. Stress T1 and ΔT1 are lower in vascular territories with reduced stress MBF but have poor accuracy for detecting impaired myocardial perfusion.