In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.

This content is currently on FREE ACCESS

More normal scans but comparable post-test referral after myocardial perfusion imaging with PET compared to CZT-SPECT in a propensity score matched cohort

Session Poster session III

Event : ICNC, Nuclear Cardiology & Cardiac CT 2019

  • Topic : imaging
  • Sub-topic : Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
  • Session type : Poster Session

Authors : JD Van Dijk (Zwolle,NL), M Mouden (Zwolle,NL), JP Ottervanger (Zwolle,NL), JA Van Dalen (Zwolle,NL), S Knollema (Zwolle,NL), PL Jager (Zwolle,NL)

JD Van Dijk1 , M Mouden2 , JP Ottervanger2 , JA Van Dalen3 , S Knollema1 , PL Jager1 , 1Isala Clinics, Nuclear Medicine - Zwolle - Netherlands (The) , 2Isala Clinics, Cardiology - Zwolle - Netherlands (The) , 3Isala Clinics, Medical Physics - Zwolle - Netherlands (The) ,

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Background: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET is more accurate than using SPECT. However, downstream clinical treatment strategies have not been compared.

Purpose: Our aim was to compare MPI scan outcomes and post-scan referral for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) between patients undergoing MPI with cadmium-zinc -telluride (CZT)-SPECT or PET in perfectly comparable groups generated by propensity score matching.

Method: 1188 patients who underwent MPI CZT-SPECT (Discovery 570, GE Healthcare) with attenuation correction and 487 patients who underwent Rb-82 PET (D690, GE Healthcare) were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score-based matching was performed using calcium score category (0, 1-100, 101-400, >400), gender, age, body weight, current smoker, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and family history as variables. The frequency of normal scans, post scan ICA, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary bypass surgery (CABG) within six months,  were compared between SPECT and PET patients.

Results: After matching, no significant differences were found between the PET (n=487) and SPECT group (n=487) except for weight (91 vs. 87kg, respectively, p<0.001). PET scans were more often interpreted as normal (84% vs. 74%, p<0.001). The number of scans showing ischemia or possible ischemia was lower for PET (10.8%) than for SPECT (21.2%, p<0.001). The percentage of ICA (9.7 vs. 11.3%, p=0.41), PCI (1.9% vs. 2.5%, p=0.51) or CABG  (1.4% vs. 1.6%,p=0.80) did not differ between the PET and SPECT, respectively.

Conclusion: As compared to CZT-SPECT, Rb-82 PET MPI results in more normal scans and fewer diagnoses of ischemia and doubtful ischemia. However, this did not translate to fewer ICA and PCI procedures within 6 months, but this may require more experience among referring cardiologists.

Get your access to resources

Join now
  • 1ESC Professional Members – access all ESC Congress resources 
  • 2ESC Association Members (Ivory, Silver, Gold) – access your Association’s resources
  • 3Under 40 or in training - with a Combined Membership, access all resources
Join now
logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are