In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.

The free consultation period for this content is over.

It is now only available year-round to EAPC Ivory (& above) Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Arterial hypertension control and association with other risk factors in remote period after myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.

Session Poster Session III - Friday 08:30 - 12:30

Speaker Andriy Yagensky

Event : ESC Preventive Cardiology (Formerly EuroPrevent) 2015

  • Topic : preventive cardiology
  • Sub-topic : Risk Factors and Prevention
  • Session type : Poster Session

Authors : A V Yagensky (Lutsk,UA), I Sichkaruk (Lutsk,UA), M Pavelko (Lutsk,UA)

A V Yagensky1 , I Sichkaruk1 , M Pavelko1 , 1Lutsk City Hospital - Lutsk - Ukraine ,


Objectives: In Ukraine cardiovascular mortality is one of the highest in Europe. Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the most important modifiable risk factors and its active control is a cornerstone of primary and secondary prevention.

Design:  Secondary prevention assessment was performed in Ukrainian city Lutsk in representative sample of 235 patients after ischemic stroke (PostIS) (age 62,6 ± 10,3 years, 124 men) and 312 patients after myocardial infarction (PostMI) (age 62,2 ± 9,9 years, 218 men) selected from 2229 patients hospitalized in one city hospital. The home-based blood pressure (BP), anthropometric measurements, questionnaire, and laboratory tests were performed.

Results: The trend to higher AH prevalence was found in PostIS patients (88,9% vs 83,6%, p=0,09). AH was treated in the same proportion of patients (88,6 PostIS and in 87,7% PostIM), but BP goals of <140/90 mmHg was reached only in 11,9% PostIS and 21,3% PostIM patients (p=0,007). This finding corresponded with higher BP in PostIS patients (systolic 161,8±28,0 vs 156,0±26,8 mmHg in PostIM, p=0,02, diastolic 95,7±13,7 vs 92,7±15,0 mmHg, p=0,02). Worse AH control in PostIS patients was associated with less tight physician control (35,4% vs 64,7% PostMI patients contacted to doctor during last 3 months, p=0,004), taking less antihypertensive drugs (1,7±0,8 vs 2,0±0,9 in PostMI; p=0,001), lower physical activity (46,0% in PostIS vs 62,0% in PostMI had regular activities; p=0,004). Both groups had similar compliance to treatment (73,0% and 71,9%). No difference in BP self-monitoring, prevalence of obesity, smoking, diabetes, lipids, glucose and hs-CRP levels was detected. Thus, the main reason for the difference between PostIS and PostMI patients is the worse physician control in PostIS patients.

Conclusions: Inadequate AH control was found in both PostIS and PostMI patients. The worse situation in PostIS patients first of all is due to the worse physician control. Active efforts in guidelines implementation should be made to improve situation.

Members get more

Join now
  • 1ESC Professional Members – access all resources from general ESC events 
  • 2ESC Association Members (Ivory, Silver, Gold) – access your Association’s resources
  • 3Under 40 or in training - with a Combined Membership, access all resources
Join now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Alliance, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, Novartis Pharma AG and Vifor Pharma in the form of educational grants. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are