In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.


The free consultation period for this content is over.

It is now only available year-round to EACVI Silver Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

What method use to provoke left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

Session Poster session 1

Speaker Matthieu Michaud

Congress : EuroEcho-Imaging 2018

  • Topic : imaging
  • Sub-topic : Echocardiography
  • Session type : Poster Session
  • FP Number : P253

Authors : M Mathelie-Guinlet (Poitiers,FR), A Reynaud (Bordeaux,FR), M Michaud (Bordeaux,FR), M Dijos (Bordeaux,FR), C Alexandrino (Bordeaux,FR), N Nasser (Bordeaux,FR), S Lafitte (Bordeaux,FR), P Reant (Bordeaux,FR)

Authors:
M Mathelie-Guinlet1 , A Reynaud2 , M Michaud2 , M Dijos2 , C Alexandrino2 , N Nasser2 , S Lafitte2 , P Reant2 , 1University Hospital of Poitiers - Poitiers - France , 2Hospital Haut Leveque - Bordeaux-Pessac - France ,

Citation:
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging ( 2019 ) 20 ( Supplement 1 ), i138

Background: Symptoms in sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) could be related to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Various provocative manoeuvres are suggested by actual guidelines to unmask maximal LVOT obstruction: Valsalva manoeuvre (VM), upright position (UP) or exercise echocardiography (EE). The aim of our study was to compare them.

Methods: Consecutive sarcomeric HCM patients referred to our tertiary centre were evaluated by echocardiography at rest, after VM, after UP, and during exercise. Exclusion criteria were: lack of one of these provocative manoeuvres, apical HCM, hypertension >160 mmHg, and insufficient ultrasound quality.

Results: Over 225 patients evaluated from January 2016 to January 2018, we finally studied 130 patients (mean age 55.2±15.7 years, 72% male). Among those patients, 61% presented LVOT obstruction (LVOT gradient =30mmHg): 19% at rest, and 42% after one of the provocation manoeuvres (figure 1). The mean pressure gradient at rest was 15.5±25.9mmHg and increased at 24.4±34.8mmHg after VM, 24.5±34.2mmHg after UP, and 56.1±57.8mmHg at peak or after EE (p<0.001). Considering only the patients with latent provocable obstruction (n=55), 31% were obstructive after VM, 31% after UP, and 93% after EE.

Conclusion: Exercise is more sensitive than VM or UP to unmask maximal LVOT obstruction in HCM by echocardiography, and should be considered first in the management particularly to optimize symptoms therapy, but also for sudden cardiac death risk stratification. Nevertheless, VM and UP are also informative, particularly for patients who can’t perform exercise. Finally, the combination of the three manoeuvres allows to unmask more cases of obstruction in practice.



Based on your interests

Members get more

Join now
  • 1ESC Professional Members – access all resources from ESC Congress and ESC Asia with APSC & AFC
  • 2ESC Association Members (Ivory, Silver, Gold) – access your Association’s congress resources
  • 3Under 40 or in training - with a Combined Membership, access resources from all congresses
Join now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Alliance, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, Novartis Pharma AG and Vifor Pharma in the form of educational grants. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are