In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.


The free consultation period for this content is over.

It is now only available year-round to EACVI Silver Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Left ventricular mechanics: novel tools to evaluate left ventricular function in patients with primary mitral regurgitation

Session Poster session 3

Speaker Elena Galli

Congress : EuroEcho-Imaging 2015

  • Topic : valvular, myocardial, pericardial, pulmonary, congenital heart disease
  • Sub-topic : Mitral Valve Stenosis
  • Session type : Poster Session
  • FP Number : P682

Authors : E Galli (Rennes,FR), C Leclercq (Rennes,FR), E Samset (Oslo,NO), E Donal (Rennes,FR)

15 views

Authors:
E Galli1 , C Leclercq1 , E Samset2 , E Donal1 , 1Hospital Pontchaillou of Rennes, Cardio-Thoracic Department - Rennes - France , 2University of Oslo - Oslo - Norway ,

Citation:
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Abstracts Supplement ( 2015 ) 16 ( Supplement 2 ), ii111

Backgroud: Left ventricular (LV) pressure–strain loops (PSLs) have been recently validated as a non-invasive index of myocardial performance. Aim of the present study is to compare average cardiac work (avgCW), positive work (avgPW), negative work (avgNW) and work efficiency (WE) in normal subjects (NOR) and in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF). The standard deviation of the integrals of the strain peaks (SDpeak) was also used as a measure of energy dispersion during systole.

Methods: we included in this study 20 NOR and 20 MR patients (mean age: 43 ± 13 vs 65 ± 11 years). Strain traces and valvular event times were used for the calculation of LV-PSLs.

Results: no differences in LVEF (65 ± 4 vs 67 ± 6%, p=NS), GLS (-23% ± 2 vs -24 ± 3%, p=NS), avgCW (2130 ± 206 vs 2151 ± 405 mmHg%, p=NS), and avgPW (2338 ± 204 vs 2461 ± 392 mmHg/%, p=NS) were found between NOR and MR patients. With respect to NOR, MR patients showed a reduction in avgNW (96 ± 70vs174 ± 67 mmHg%, p=0.01) and an increased WE (96 ± 3 vs 92 ± 3, p=0.0001). Despite this, a slight but significant increase in energy dissipation during systole was observed in MR, as shown by the higher SDpeak (1.21 ± 0.33 vs 0.97 ± 0.25, p=0.01).

Conclusions: in patients with severe MR and normal LV performance, avgCW, and avgPW are preserved, with MR in the left atrium being probably responsible of the significant reduction in the LV avgNW. Despite this, a certain degree of dyssynchrony in LV segments activation was present, which explains increased the slightly energy dissipation during systole. Further studies on larger cohorts of patients are necessary to clarify the variation of these indexes in the different phases of the MR continuum and to evaluate their applicability in clinical practice.



Based on your interests

Three reasons why you should become a member

Become a member now
  • 1Access your congress resources all year-round on the New ESC 365
  • 2Get a discount on your next congress registration
  • 3Continue your professional development with free access to educational tools
Become a member now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, and Novartis Pharma AG. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are