In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.

Member Benefit

This content is only available year-round to EACVI Silver Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Accuracy and prognostic value of physiologist-led stress echocardiography for coronary disease

Session Stress echocardiography in 2020

Speaker Jamal Nasir Khan

Event : EuroEcho 2019

  • Topic : imaging
  • Sub-topic : Stress Echocardiography
  • Session type : Rapid Fire Abstracts

Authors : JN Khan (Coventry,GB), T Griffiths (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), K Sandhu (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), S Cabezon (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), CS Kwok (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), S Baig (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), T Naneishvili (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), VCK Lee (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), A Pasricha (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), E Robins (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), P Kanagala (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), R Butler (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), S Duckett (Stoke-on-Trent,GB), G Heatlie (Stoke-on-Trent,GB)

Authors:
JN Khan1 , T Griffiths2 , K Sandhu2 , S Cabezon2 , CS Kwok2 , S Baig2 , T Naneishvili2 , VCK Lee2 , A Pasricha2 , E Robins2 , P Kanagala2 , R Butler2 , S Duckett2 , G Heatlie2 , 1University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust - Coventry - United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland , 2Royal Stoke University Hospital, Cardiology - Stoke-on-Trent - United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland ,

Topic(s):
Stress Echocardiography

Background: Cardiac physiologist-led stress echocardiography (PLSE) services provide potential for expansion of SE services and increased productivity for cardiologists.  There is no published data on the accuracy or prognostic value of PLSE.

Purpose: To assess and compare the accuracy and prognostic value of PLSE and cardiologist-led stress echocardiography (CLSE) for CAD assessment

Methods: Retrospective study of 898 subjects undergoing PLSE (n=393) or CLSE (n=505) for CAD assessment using exercise or dobutamine. For accuracy assessment, the primary outcome was the ability of stress echocardiography to identify significant CAD on invasive angiography (ICA).  Incidence of 24-month non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), total and cardiac mortality, revascularisation and combined major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed.

Results:  Demographics, comorbidities, CAD predictors and cardiac medications were matched between the PLSE and CLSE groups.  PLSE had high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy (85%, 74%, 69%, 88%, 78% respectively).  PLSE accuracy measures were similar and non-inferior to CLSE.  There was a similar incidence of individual and combined outcomes in PLSE and CLSE subjects.  Negative stress echocardiography conferred a low incidence of non-fatal MI (PLSE 1.4% vs. CLSE 0.9%, p=0.464), cardiac mortality (0.6% vs. 0.0%, p=0.277) and MACE (6.8% vs. 3.1%, p=0.404).

Conclusion: This is the largest study of PLSE accuracy and first study of the prognostic value of PLSE.  PLSE demonstrates high and non-inferior accuracy compared with CLSE for CAD assessment.  Negative PLSE and CLSE confer a similarly very low incidence of cardiac outcomes, confirming for the first time the important prognostic value of PLSE.

Marker of diagnostic test Total (n=72) PLSE (n=32) CLSE (n=40) p
Significant CAD present (n, %) 20 (27.8%) 12 (37.5%) 8 (20.0%) 0.167
* Single-vessel CAD 12 (60.0%) 7 (58.3%) 5 (62.5%) 0.325
* Multi-vessel CAD 8 (40.0%) 5 (41.7%) 3 (37.5%) 0.325
Sensitivity 76% (66-76%) 85% (73-97%) 63% (48-78%) Non-significant
Specificity 73% (63-73%) 74% (59-89%) 72% (58-86%) Non-significant
Positive predictive value (PPV) 53% (42-64%) 69% (53-85%) 29% (15-43%) Significant
Negative predictive value (NPV) 88% (80-96%) 88% (77-99%) 88% (78-98%) Non-significant
Overall accuracy 74% (64-84%) 78% (64-92%) 70% (56-84%) Non-significant
Accuracy data expressed as value (95% confidence interval). CAD= coronary artery disease. Differences in values between PLSE and CLSE considered statistically significant if no crossover in 95% confidence intervals

Member Benefit

This content is only available year-round to EACVI Silver Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Get your access to resources

Join now
  • 1ESC Professional Members – access all ESC Congress resources 
  • 2ESC Association Members (Ivory, Silver, Gold) – access your Association’s resources
  • 3Under 40 or in training - with a Combined Membership, access all resources
Join now
logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are