In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.


The free consultation period for this content is over.

It is now only available year-round to EACVI Silver Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance-derived myocardial stress perfusion assessments for the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease

Session Poster session 1

Speaker Martina Chantal De Knegt

Congress : EuroCMR 2019

  • Topic : imaging
  • Sub-topic : Cross-Modality and Multi-Modality Imaging Topics
  • Session type : Poster Session
  • FP Number : P142

Authors : M C De Knegt (London,GB), A Rossi (London,GB), SE Petersen (London,GB), A Wragg (London,GB), M Westwood (London,GB), B Saberwal (London,GB), MT Jensen (London,GB), F Pugliese (London,GB)

Authors:
M C De Knegt1 , A Rossi1 , SE Petersen1 , A Wragg1 , M Westwood1 , B Saberwal1 , MT Jensen1 , F Pugliese1 , 1Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, William Harvey Research Institute - London - United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland ,

Citation:
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging ( 2019 ) 20 ( Supplement 2 ), ii88

Background: The noninvasive assessment of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) using dynamic stress myocardial perfusion imaging by computed tomography (CT-MPI) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-MPI) may aid in correct patient selection for elective invasive coronary angiography.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and incremental value of CT-MPI and CMR-MPI versus cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) alone in the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant CAD using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the reference standard.

Methods: Stenosis severity by CCTA and dynamic stress myocardial perfusion by CT (visual CT-MPI and quantitative relative myocardial blood flow (CT-MBF)) and CMR (visual CMR-MPI and semiquantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (CMR-MPRI)) were assessed in patients with stable angina pectoris. CCTA stenosis =50% was considered obstructive. Optimal thresholds for CT-MBF and CMR-MPRI were defined by area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis. Haemodynamically significant CAD was defined as FFR <0.80 or QCA diameter narrowing =80% if FFR was not performed. Odds ratios and diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant CAD were determined.

Results: A total of 218 vessels from 93 patients were assessed. Vessel/territorial odds ratios for CCTA stenosis =50%, visual CT-MPI, CT-MBF =0.72 mL/min/gram, visual CMR-MPI, and CMR-MPRI =1.06 for the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant CAD were all highly significant, also after adjustment for age and gender (all p<0.001). The AUC (95% confidence interval (CI)), sensitivity (95% CI), and specificity (95% CI) for CCTA: 0.79 (0.72-0.85), 0.82 (0.68-0.91), and 0.76 (0.69-0.82, respectively; for visual CT-MPI: 0.64 (0.56-0.72), 0.47 (0.34-0.61), and 0.79 (0.72-0.85), respectively; for CT-MBF: 0.86 (0.81-0.92), 0.84 (0.77-0.89), and 0.89 (0.83-0.93), respectively; for visual CMR-MPI: 0.84 (0.77-0.90), 0.79 (0.67-0.88), and 0.88 (0.82-0.92), respectively; for CMR-MPRI: 0.71 (0.64-0.79), 0.53 (0.38-0.66), and 0.89 (0.82-0.94), respectively. Head-to-head, CCTA, CT-MBF and visual CMR-MPI outperformed visual CT-MPI (all p<0.01), and CT-MBF and visual CMR-MPI outperformed CMR-MPRI (all p<0.01). CT-MPI and CMR-MPI yielded significant incremental diagnostic value over CCTA in the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant CAD (see figure). Combined CCTA+CT-MPI and CCTA+CMR-MPI versus CCTA alone resulted in significantly increased specificity from 0.76 to =0.95 (all p<0.001), albeit with a significant decrease in sensitivity from 0.82 to =0.69 (all p<0.05). 

Conclusions: CCTA and stress myocardial perfusion assessments by CT and CMR diagnose haemodynamically significant CAD. Both CT-MPI and CMR-MPI provide incremental diagnostic value compared with CCTA alone and can accurately rule out haemodynamically significant CAD.



Based on your interests

Members get more

Join now
  • 1ESC Professional Members – access all resources from ESC Congress and ESC Asia with APSC & AFC
  • 2ESC Association Members (Ivory, Silver, Gold) – access your Association’s congress resources
  • 3Under 40 or in training - with a Combined Membership, access resources from all congresses
Join now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Alliance, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, Novartis Pharma AG and Vifor Pharma in the form of educational grants. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are