In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.


22 days left for free access

Why do clinicians withhold anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2VASc score of 2 or higher?

Session Poster Session 4

Speaker Assistant Professor Deborah Michelle Siegal

Congress : ESC Congress

  • Topic : arrhythmias and device therapy
  • Sub-topic : Oral Anticoagulation
  • Session type : Poster Session
  • FP Number : P3848

Authors : DM Siegal (Hamilton,CA), F Verbrugge (Leuven,BE), AC Martin (Paris,FR), A Fiarresga (Lisboa,PT), J Camm (London,GB), K Pieper (Durham,US), KAA Fox (Edinburgh,GB), JP Bassand (Besançon,FR), S Haas (Munich,DE), SZ Goldhaber (Boston,US), AK Kakkar (London,GB)

15 views

Authors:
D.M. Siegal1 , F. Verbrugge2 , A.C. Martin3 , A. Fiarresga4 , J. Camm5 , K. Pieper6 , K.A.A. Fox7 , J.P. Bassand8 , S. Haas9 , S.Z. Goldhaber10 , A.K. Kakkar11 , 1McMaster University, Dept. of Medicine - Hamilton - Canada , 2University Hospitals (UZ) Leuven, Dept. of Cardiovascular Medicine - Leuven - Belgium , 3Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy - Paris - France , 4Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central - Lisboa - Portugal , 5St George's University of London - London - United Kingdom , 6Duke Clinical Research Institute - Durham - United States of America , 7University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science - Edinburgh - United Kingdom , 8University of Besançon, Dept. of Cardiology - Besançon - France , 9Technical University of Munich, Dept. of Medicine - Munich - Germany , 10Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dept. of Medicine - Boston - United States of America , 11University College London - London - United Kingdom ,

On behalf: GARFIELD-AF Investigators

Citation:
European Heart Journal ( 2018 ) 39 ( Supplement ), 821

Background: Guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy to prevent stroke and systemic embolism for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high thromboembolic risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2). Approximately 30–40% of eligible patients do not receive OAC therapy. The reasons for guideline non-adherence are unclear.

Purpose: To identify patient characteristics associated with non-use of OAC for AF.

Methods: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD-AF) registry is a prospective multicentre study of patients with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 additional risk factors for stroke. We analysed GARFIELD-AF data for patient characteristics associated with non-use of OAC for patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 using logistic regression. The rates per 100 person-years (%/y) of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding were also compared between patients receiving and those not receiving OAC. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. To explore patient characteristics that influence decision-making, we distributed a web-based survey to physicians treating AF in Belgium, Canada, France, and Portugal.

Results: In GARFIELD-AF 42,471 (82.9%) had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 and 12,884 (30.3%) of them did not receive OAC therapy. Use of antiplatelet therapy (OR 15.0, 95% CI 14.1–15.8) and a history of bleeding (OR 2.52, 95% CI 2.18–2.92) were the strongest predictors of withholding OAC. Patients without OAC had an increased incidence of all-cause mortality (5.3 vs. 3.9%/y, p<0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (1.8 vs. 1.4%/y, p<0.001) and SSE (1.6 vs. 1.1%/y, p<0.001). Table 1 shows the most frequently reported characteristics leading to a preference to withhold OAC among 266 survey respondents.

Conclusions: Antiplatelet therapy and history of bleeding were the strongest predictors of OAC non-use in AF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 in the GARFIELD-AF registry. Major/critical site bleeding and cirrhosis may also influence non-use of OAC by some physicians. Guideline-based treatment with OAC was associated with better outcomes. Understanding decision-making may improve OAC prescription rates and outcomes in AF.

Table 1. Survey Results
CharacteristicRespondents reporting a preference to withhold OAC, Total n=266 (%)
Critical site bleeding87
Major bleeding (requiring hospitalization, intervention, medical management)76
Cirrhosis53
CKD (eGFR <15 mL/min or dialysis)47
Suspected heavy/binge drinking38
CKD=chronic kidney disease, eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Please login to My ESC

This content may be restricted, please sign in to check your access.



Based on your interests

Three reasons why you should become a member

Become a member now
  • 1Access your congress resources all year-round on the New ESC 365
  • 2Get a discount on your next congress registration
  • 3Continue your professional development with free access to educational tools
Become a member now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, and Novartis Pharma AG. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are