In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Thrombolysis for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: 6-month follow-up of the PEITHO trial

Congress : ESC Congress

  • Topic : valvular, myocardial, pericardial, pulmonary, congenital heart disease
  • Sub-topic : Pulmonary Embolism
  • Session type : Abstract Session
  • FP Number : 63

Authors : S V Konstantinides (Mainz,DE), G Meyer (Paris,FR), T Danays (Reims,FR), E Vicaut (Paris,FR)


S.V. Konstantinides1 , G. Meyer2 , T. Danays3 , E. Vicaut4 , 1University Medical Center of Mainz, Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis - Mainz - Germany , 2University Paris-Descartes, Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou - Paris - France , 3Boehringer Ingelheim - Reims - France , 4University Paris Diderot - Paris - France ,

On behalf: the PEITHO investigators

European Heart Journal ( 2014 ) 35 ( Abstract Supplement ), 9

Normotensive patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), indicated by the presence of acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and myocardial injury, have an elevated risk of adverse outcome. It remains unclear whether fibrinolysis can improve the long-term prognosis of intermediate-risk PE.

Methods and results: The Pulmonary EmbolIsm THrOmbolysis trial (PEITHO) is an investigator-initiated, academic-sponsor, prospective, multicenter, international, randomized (1:1), double-blind comparison of thrombolysis with weight-adapted i.v. bolus tenecteplase versus placebo in normotensive patients with confirmed acute PE. Patients had RV dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography, plus a positive troponin I or T test. Both treatment groups received standard anticoagulation. The primary efficacy outcome was death from any cause or haemodynamic collapse within 7 days of randomization. A total of 1006 patients were enrolled at 76 sites in 13 countries. The results regarding the primary efficacy outcome have been presented. Briefly, thrombolytic therapy reduced (from 5.6% to 2.6%; P=0.015) the primary end point at the cost of an increased risk of major haemorrhage, particularly haemorrhagic stroke (2.4% versus 0.2%; P=0.003). Death rates at 30 days were 2.4% and 3.2% respectively.

Six-month (180-day) follow-up data were available for 486 patients (98.4%) of the tenecteplase and 474 (98.1%) of the placebo (heparin-only) arm. During this period, a total of 35 patients (7.0%) in the tenecteplase and 30 (6.1%) in the placebo group died (P=0.566). Six-month death rates for patients who survived the first 30 days after randomization were 4.7% and 3.0% respectively (P=0.152). Most deaths occurring within the first 30 days resulted from acute PE or the complications of treatment; between day 30 and day 180, 16/23 (70%) of deaths in the tenecteplase and 12/14 (86%) in the placebo arm were due to the underlying disease, particularly cancer. Residual dyspnoea at 6 months was assessed in 71.2% of the patients, 45.2%, 20.4%, 4.8% and 0.6% were in NYHA stage I, II, III and IV, respectively, without difference between the groups. In 51% of the patients, follow-up echocardiography was performed without significant differences in the rates of residual pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction.

Conclusions: In a large randomized trial of patients with intermediate-risk PE, thrombolytic treatment did not affect 6-month mortality, residual dyspnea and RV dysfunction. In patients who survive the first 30 days after acute PE, late deaths are primarily due to underlying disease.

Some member-only content

This content is restricted please sign in to check your access

Three reasons why you should become a member

Become a member now
  • 1Access your congress resources all year-round on the New ESC 365
  • 2Get a discount on your next congress registration
  • 3Continue your professional development with free access to educational tools
Become a member now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, and Novartis Pharma AG. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are